Integrate into Firebase and Angularfire

[warain]

I would like to integrate this application into Angularfire to take advantage of what google and firebase has to offer, anybody looking to join this process?

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

[ghost]

Well. That will be a good thing. Am in

[warain]

I am not formular with mentor, I can take a look at the code, anywhere in particular we can star?

[graywolf336]

This application isn't built with Angular, so I don't see how this would work?

[warain]

is there any way to integrate firebase REST api

[ghost]

I would have to dive deep into the code to see how it works

[Sing-Li]

Firebase 👍 Angularfire 👎 Reactfire 👍

[geekgonecrazy]

What exactly would be the purpose of integrating Firebase? As a replacement for our database or what?

[a7medo778]

well using firebase as a backbone can almost eliminate the need for a server, i mean you can basically scale infinitely without worrying about scaling the infrastructure
that and slew of ready to be used features

[a7medo778]

kinda yes
because you would've arranged your database in a way to accommodate all
chats
so you can update the 1,000,000 "room" in the db without even feeling any
kind of load or latency because of the nature of the service

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:41 AM, SingLi notifications@github.com wrote:

So a thought exercise just so I understand the line of thought.

I get into a chat with 1,000,000 users just to direct message with
@geekgonecrazy https://github.com/geekgonecrazy.

With firebase and eliminate the need for the server, are you saying every
single browser client copy should maintain information on 1,000,000 users
so that two can direct message?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1570 (comment)

[Sing-Li]

Then everyone with more than 1GB of storage requirements will have to pay
$50 a month?

_Sing Li_Core Contributor

sing.li@rocket.chat

• 55 51 30855151 <+555130855151>

@ https://demo.rocket.chat/direct/sing.lising.li

https://rocket.chat

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:05 PM, a7medo778 notifications@github.com wrote:

kinda yes
because you would've arranged your database in a way to accommodate all
chats
so you can update the 1,000,000 "room" in the db without even feeling any
kind of load or latency because of the nature of the service

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:41 AM, SingLi notifications@github.com wrote:

So a thought exercise just so I understand the line of thought.

I get into a chat with 1,000,000 users just to direct message with
@geekgonecrazy https://github.com/geekgonecrazy.

With firebase and eliminate the need for the server, are you saying every
single browser client copy should maintain information on 1,000,000 users
so that two can direct message?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#1570 (comment)

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1570 (comment)

[warain]

@Sing-Li is pricing with firebase your reservation?

[warain]

I think what firebase allows us to do is integrate other firebase hosted application well with rocket since,

[a7medo778]

chats doesn't really take that much space, images and voice and video are offloaded to s3 anyways
The ability to have a scalable app with minimum cost and self growing infra is really good for some use cases

Regards
Ahmed

On Mar 23, 2016, at 5:59 PM, SingLi notifications@github.com wrote:

Then everyone with more than 1GB of storage requirements will have to pay
$50 a month?

_Sing Li_Core Contributor

sing.li@rocket.chat

• 55 51 30855151 <+555130855151>

@ https://demo.rocket.chat/direct/sing.lising.li

https://rocket.chat

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:05 PM, a7medo778 notifications@github.com wrote:

kinda yes
because you would've arranged your database in a way to accommodate all
chats
so you can update the 1,000,000 "room" in the db without even feeling any
kind of load or latency because of the nature of the service

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:41 AM, SingLi notifications@github.com wrote:

So a thought exercise just so I understand the line of thought.

I get into a chat with 1,000,000 users just to direct message with
@geekgonecrazy https://github.com/geekgonecrazy.

With firebase and eliminate the need for the server, are you saying every
single browser client copy should maintain information on 1,000,000 users
so that two can direct message?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#1570 (comment)

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1570 (comment)

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

[Sing-Li]

Agreed for some use cases.

Why do they charge $150 a month minimum for private backup? Does it mean that to export data, you need the minimum $150/month plan? tia

[Sing-Li]

@warain I would conservatively estimate that monthly recurring cost is a concern for over 60% of our FOSS user base.

Just need to understand more before we can even begin considering the priority of this work.

Thanks for all the help and information.

[MartinSchoeler]

As this feature will hardly be implemented in the near future, as seen that is not on our roadmap. I will close this. This will be reopened when we reconsider adding this feature. Thanks for all the feedback!

[geekgonecrazy]

Feel free to propose in detail on our forums for future consideration as a feature

[18739940427]

This application isn't built with Angular, so I don't see how this would work?

Have you found a way to refer to angular?