Skip to content

Changesets config tweak #6733

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mrubens merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2025
Merged

Changesets config tweak #6733

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion .changeset/config.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,5 +7,12 @@
"access": "restricted",
"baseBranch": "main",
"updateInternalDependencies": "patch",
"ignore": []
"ignore": [
Copy link
Contributor

@roomote roomote bot Aug 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be helpful to add a comment here explaining why these packages are ignored? Something like:

This would help future contributors understand the purpose of this configuration.

"@roo-code/types",
Copy link
Contributor

@roomote roomote bot Aug 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor suggestion: Consider sorting these packages alphabetically for better maintainability:

"@roo-code/web-evals",
"@roo-code/web-roo-code",
"@roo-code/evals",
"@roo-code/ipc",
"@roo-code/telemetry"
Copy link
Contributor

@roomote roomote bot Aug 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed that and are also private packages in the monorepo. Should these be added to the ignore list as well for consistency?

]
}
Loading