-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
feat: add OpenAI GPT OSS model to Cerebras providers #6734
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -63,4 +63,14 @@ export const cerebrasModels = { | |
| description: "SOTA performance with ~1500 tokens/s", | ||
| supportsReasoningEffort: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| "gpt-oss-120b": { | ||
| maxTokens: 8000, | ||
| contextWindow: 64000, | ||
| supportsImages: false, | ||
| supportsPromptCache: false, | ||
| inputPrice: 0, | ||
| outputPrice: 0, | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I noticed the PR description mentions "Pricing: Free (/bin/sh)" which appears to be a typo. Is this intentional, or should it be "Free (no cost)" or similar? |
||
| description: | ||
| "OpenAI GPT OSS model with ~2800 tokens/s\n\n• 64K context window\n• Excels at efficient reasoning across science, math, and coding", | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The PR notes mention "limited tool calling support" for this model. Would it be helpful to add this information to the description field? For example: |
||
| }, | ||
| } as const satisfies Record<string, ModelInfo> | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider maintaining alphabetical order for the model entries. Currently, the models aren't strictly alphabetical, but as the list grows, this could improve maintainability. Would you consider placing this entry in alphabetical order among the other models?