Refactor /patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js tests for json api
#1304
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nmajor25 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve significant enhancements to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
nmajor25
force-pushed
the
refactor-reduced-sched
branch
from
766999b to
f1f9ad9
Compare
|
|
||
| fx.data = _.times(50, n => { | ||
| const clone = _.clone(action); | ||
| const clone = _.clone(testAction); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My assumption is that this is more efficient than doing:
fx.data = _.times(50, n => {
const testAction = getAction();
. . .
});Doing one getAction() and then cloning it 50 times vs. doing a separate getAction() 50 times.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
well we're already doing _.times getAction in the schedule tests. although I'm not sure either tests need to do 50 necessarily. The tests in the schedule tests look cleaner to me... maybe we start off by making them the same and we can look at efficiency afterwards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Didn't see that in the schedule tests. Ya, I agree that that is cleaner 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay I've updated these to match what's in the schedule tests.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js (11 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (24)
test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js (24)
5-14: LGTM!The new imports for helper functions are appropriate and necessary for the dynamic generation of test data.
The code changes are approved.
18-23: LGTM!The introduction of
currentClinicianusinggetCurrentClinicianenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
24-29: LGTM!The introduction of
testPatientusinggetPatientenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
31-38: LGTM!The introduction of
testFlowusinggetFlowenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
40-51: LGTM!The introduction of
testActionusinggetActionenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
56-57: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
fx.datatocurrentClinicianis appropriate.The code changes are approved.
61-89: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
fx.dataandfx.includedto dynamically generated actions and entities enhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
94-95: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
fx.datatotestActionis appropriate.The code changes are approved.
98-99: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
fx.datatotestPatientis appropriate.The code changes are approved.
111-112: LGTM!The dynamic URL parameter assertions using
currentClinician.idandstateTodo.idenhance the robustness of the tests.The code changes are approved.
261-266: LGTM!The introduction of
currentClinicianusinggetCurrentClinicianenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
270-271: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
testActionusinggetActionis appropriate.The code changes are approved.
272-277: LGTM!The introduction of
testPatientOneusinggetPatientenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
279-284: LGTM!The introduction of
testPatientTwousinggetPatientenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
287-308: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
fx.dataandfx.includedto dynamically generated actions and entities enhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
376-381: LGTM!The introduction of
currentClinicianusinggetCurrentClinicianenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
385-387: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
actionusinggetActionis appropriate.The code changes are approved.
387-391: LGTM!The introduction of
testPatientOneusinggetPatientenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
394-399: LGTM!The introduction of
testPatientTwousinggetPatientenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
401-420: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
fx.dataandfx.includedto dynamically generated actions and entities enhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
550-555: LGTM!The introduction of
currentClinicianusinggetCurrentClinicianenhances the flexibility of the tests.The code changes are approved.
563-563: LGTM!The dynamic URL parameter assertion using
stateTodo.idandstateInProgress.idenhances the robustness of the tests.The code changes are approved.
589-589: LGTM!The dynamic URL parameter assertion using
stateInProgress.idenhances the robustness of the tests.The code changes are approved.
603-603: LGTM!The dynamic URL parameter assertion using
stateTodo.idandstateInProgress.idenhances the robustness of the tests.The code changes are approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js (4)
24-29: Discrepancies ingetPatientFunction UsageNot all instances of
getPatientin the codebase match the new usage pattern with theattributesobject. Some calls togetPatientare made without theattributesparameter or with different arguments. Here are some examples:
test/integration/patients/sidebar/flow-sidebar.js: const testPatient = getPatient();test/integration/forms/action.js: fx.data = getPatient({ id: '1' });These discrepancies indicate that the function usage is inconsistent with the new pattern. Please review and update the function calls to ensure they align with the intended usage.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.
The dynamic generation of
testPatientenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetPatientmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getPatient` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type js -A 5 $'getPatient'Length of output: 56687
387-391: SomegetPatientfunction calls do not match the new usage pattern.Upon reviewing the occurrences of
getPatient, it appears that not all instances adhere to the expected pattern of passing an object withattributes. Here are some examples where the usage might not match:
test/support/api/patients.js: The functiongetPatientis called without passing an object withattributesin some instances.test/integration/patients/patient/sidebar.js: There are instances wheregetPatientis called without theattributesobject.Please review these occurrences to ensure they align with the new usage pattern.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.
The dynamic generation of
testPatientOneenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetPatientmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getPatient` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type js -A 5 $'getPatient'Length of output: 56687
272-277: Ensure allgetPatientfunction calls match the new usage patternSome instances of
getPatientdo not include theattributesobject, indicating a mismatch with the new pattern. Please review and update the following locations:
test/integration/outreach/outreach.js: Line wheregetPatientis assigned totestPatient.test/integration/patients/patient/sidebar.js: Line wheregetPatientis called withoutattributes.test/integration/patients/patient/dashboard.js: Line wheregetPatientis called withoutattributes.Please verify and update these instances to ensure consistency with the new usage pattern.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.
The dynamic generation of
testPatientOneenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetPatientmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getPatient` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type js -A 5 $'getPatient'Length of output: 56687
40-51: InconsistentgetActionUsage Across CodebaseThe
getActionfunction is not consistently used according to the new pattern across the codebase. Some instances lack necessary attributes or relationships, while others are empty. Please review the following files for discrepancies:
test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.jstest/integration/patients/worklist/worklist.jstest/integration/patients/patient/patient-flow.jstest/integration/forms/action.jsEnsure that all calls to
getActionmatch the new usage pattern with the required attributes and relationships.Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.
The dynamic generation of
testActionenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetActionmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getAction` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type js -A 5 $'getAction'Length of output: 69931
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract detailed information about each `getAction` call to verify if they match the new usage pattern. # Search for `getAction` calls and extract surrounding lines for context. rg --type js -A 10 -B 2 $'getAction'Length of output: 137725
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js (11 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js (10)
7-14: LGTM!The new import statements are appropriate and necessary for the dynamic generation of test data.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
287-302: LGTM!The dynamic generation of actions using
_.cloneimproves efficiency and maintainability. The approach is more efficient than generating separate actions multiple times.The code changes are approved.
401-417: LGTM!The dynamic generation of actions using
_.cloneimproves efficiency and maintainability. The approach is more efficient than generating separate actions multiple times.The code changes are approved.
18-23: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The dynamic generation of
currentClinicianenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetCurrentClinicianmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified:
getCurrentClinicianis Consistently Used Across the CodebaseThe function
getCurrentClinicianis used consistently with the new dynamic generation approach across various files. The usage aligns with the intended flexibility and enhances test adaptability. No inconsistencies were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getCurrentClinician` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type js -A 5 $'getCurrentClinician'Length of output: 40781
550-555: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The dynamic generation of
currentClinicianenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetCurrentClinicianmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified:
getCurrentClinicianMatches New PatternThe
getCurrentClinicianfunction is consistently used with the new pattern involving arelationshipsobject across the codebase. No discrepancies were found in the usage pattern.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getCurrentClinician` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type js -A 5 $'getCurrentClinician'Length of output: 40781
394-399: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The dynamic generation of
testPatientTwoenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetPatientmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
261-265: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The dynamic generation of
currentClinicianenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetCurrentClinicianmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
279-284: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The dynamic generation of
testPatientTwoenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetPatientmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Consistent Usage of
getPatientFunctionThe
getPatientfunction is consistently used across the codebase with the new pattern of passing an object withattributes. This matches the usage in the file under review, confirming that the dynamic generation of test patients is uniformly applied. No discrepancies were found in the function's usage.
- The function is correctly used in
test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.jsand other test files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `getPatient` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type js -A 5 $'getPatient'Length of output: 56687
376-380: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The dynamic generation of
currentClinicianenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetCurrentClinicianmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
31-38: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The dynamic generation of
testFlowenhances test flexibility. Ensure that all function calls togetFlowmatch the new usage.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend
|
| Branch Review |
refactor-reduced-sched
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 10m 43s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Nick Major |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
1
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
309
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 43063bb7-c588-4531-aa74-8932d44639f1Details
💛 - Coveralls |
| const testFlow = getFlow({ | ||
| attributes: { | ||
| name: 'Complex Care Management', | ||
| details: null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
probably don't need to set details... Actually this could probably just be testFlow = getFlow();
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup, testFlow = getFlow() works
|
|
||
| fx.data = _.times(50, n => { | ||
| const clone = _.clone(action); | ||
| const clone = _.clone(testAction); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
well we're already doing _.times getAction in the schedule tests. although I'm not sure either tests need to do 50 necessarily. The tests in the schedule tests look cleaner to me... maybe we start off by making them the same and we can look at efficiency afterwards.
nmajor25
force-pushed
the
refactor-reduced-sched
branch
2 times, most recently
from
57f451a to
27e0ff2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js (10 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (17)
test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.js (17)
4-13: LGTM!The new imports are necessary for the dynamic data generation and improve the maintainability of the tests.
The code changes are approved.
530-534: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The dynamic generation of entities using helper functions like
getCurrentClinician,getPatient,getFlow, andgetActionis correctly implemented and used consistently across the codebase. No issues were found with the implementation.
- The usage in
test/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.jsaligns with the intended design.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
253-257: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
362-366: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Entity Generation Verified
The helper functions for dynamic entity generation are consistently used across the codebase, including in the file under review. This confirms their intended functionality and correctness in generating test data.
- The functions
getCurrentClinician,getPatient,getFlow, andgetActionare used extensively and imported from a shared utility directory, indicating they are reliable for test data generation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
23-28: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The
getPatientfunction is correctly used for dynamic entity generation across the codebase, including in thetest/integration/patients/worklist/reduced-schedule.jsfile. The function is defined intest/support/api/patients.jsand is part of a suite of helper functions for generating test data. No issues were found with its usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
569-569: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The helper functions for dynamic entity generation (
getCurrentClinician,getPatient,getFlow,getAction) are implemented correctly and used appropriately in the codebase. They ensure flexibility and correctness in generating entities dynamically. No issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definitions of the helper functions to verify their correctness. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
262-267: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities is Correctly Implemented
The helper functions
getPatient,getCurrentClinician,getFlow, andgetActionare correctly implemented to dynamically generate entities with appropriate relationships and data. These functions are well-structured and include mechanisms to prevent excessive recursion. The dynamic generation of entities is functioning as intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of the helper functions to verify their correctness. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
378-382: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The helper functions
getPatient,getFlow,getAction, andgetCurrentClinicianare correctly implemented for dynamic entity generation. They use default relationships and data, with mechanisms to handle recursion safely. This ensures the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. The dynamic generation of entities is verified and correct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the implementation of the helper functions to verify their correctness. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
371-376: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities is Correctly Implemented and Used
The helper functions
getPatient,getCurrentClinician,getFlow, andgetActionare designed to dynamically generate entities with appropriate relationships and data. Their implementations ensure flexibility and variability, confirming that the dynamic generation of entities is correct. The usage across various test files aligns with their intended purpose.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of the getPatient function ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Find the implementation of the getCurrentClinician function ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Find the implementation of the getFlow function ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Find the implementation of the getAction function ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
276-292: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The helper functionsgetActionandgetPatientare correctly implemented to support dynamic generation of entities. They use a depth parameter to manage recursion and allow for flexible customization of attributes and relationships. The code changes are verified and align with the intended functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the getAction function ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the definition of the getPatient function ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 2972
543-543: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified Successfully
The functions
getCurrentClinician,getPatient,getFlow, andgetActionare implemented to dynamically generate entities with appropriate relationships and unique identifiers. The code changes improve flexibility and maintainability, and the dynamic generation of entities is correctly implemented.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the implementation of the helper functions to verify dynamic generation of entities. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
17-21: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The functions
getCurrentClinician,getPatient,getFlow, andgetActionare correctly implemented for dynamic entity generation. They define default relationships and use utility functions to create and merge resources, ensuring safe handling of recursive relationships. The changes in thespecify('display schedule')function are valid and improve test flexibility and maintainability.
getCurrentClinicianis defined intest/support/api/clinicians.js.getPatientis defined intest/support/api/patients.js.getFlowis defined intest/support/api/flows.js.getActionis defined intest/support/api/actions.js.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the definitions of the helper functions to ensure they are correctly implemented. # Search for the definition of getCurrentClinician ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the definition of getPatient ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the definition of getFlow ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the definition of getAction ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
385-398: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified Successfully
The helper functions
getAction,getPatient,getFlow, andgetCurrentClinicianare correctly implemented for dynamic entity generation. They utilize helper functions to populate relationships and ensure valid data structures, enhancing the flexibility and maintainability of the tests.
getAction: Generates actions with relationships to patients, clinicians, and other entities.getPatient: Generates patients with relationships to actions, flows, and other entities.getFlow: Generates flows with relationships to actions, patients, and other entities.getCurrentClinician: Generates clinicians with relationships to roles, teams, and workspaces.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of getAction, getPatient, getFlow, and getCurrentClinician functions. # Search for the implementation of getAction ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the implementation of getPatient ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the implementation of getFlow ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the implementation of getCurrentClinician ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
583-583: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The dynamic generation of entities usinggetCurrentClinician,getPatient,getFlow, andgetActionis correctly implemented. These functions dynamically create entities with appropriate relationships, ensuring flexibility and maintainability in the tests.
getCurrentClinicianintest/support/api/clinicians.jsgetPatientintest/support/api/patients.jsgetFlowintest/support/api/flows.jsgetActionintest/support/api/actions.jsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of getCurrentClinician ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 891
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of getPatient ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1268
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of getFlow ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1543
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of getAction ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1703
30-30: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified Successfully
The functions responsible for dynamic generation of entities (
getFlow,getPatient,getAction, andgetCurrentClinician) are implemented correctly. They utilize structured methods to create entities with appropriate relationships and attributes, ensuring flexibility and maintainability in the tests. The use of depth control and relationship management confirms their robustness.
- Implementations are found in the
test/support/apidirectory.- Functions use
getResourceandmergeJsonApifor structured entity creation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the implementation of the function `getFlow` ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Locate the implementation of the function `getPatient` ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Locate the implementation of the function `getAction` ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Locate the implementation of the function `getCurrentClinician` ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
32-43: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
Verification successful
Dynamic Generation of Entities Verified
The dynamic generation of entities using
getCurrentClinician,getPatient,getFlow, andgetActionis correctly implemented. These functions set up entities with appropriate default relationships and allow for customization, ensuring flexibility and maintainability in tests.
getCurrentClinician: Sets up role, team, and workspaces relationships.getPatient: Includes actions, flows, patient-fields, visits, and workspaces.getFlow: Covers actions, author, owner, patient, program, program-flow, and state.getAction: Encompasses author, comments, files, flow, form, form-responses, owner, patient, program, program-action, recipient, and state.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dynamic generation of entities. # Test: Search for the helper functions. Expect: Correct usage of helper functions. rg --type js 'getCurrentClinician|getPatient|getFlow|getAction'Length of output: 38847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the helper functions to verify their correctness. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getCurrentClinician($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getPatient($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getFlow($_, $_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function getAction($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 5408
269-273: LGTM! But verify the dynamic generation of entities.The changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the tests. However, ensure that the dynamic generation of entities is correct.
The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the dynamic generation of entities:
nmajor25
force-pushed
the
refactor-reduced-sched
branch
from
27e0ff2 to
4f2fd9a
Compare
Shortcut Story ID: [sc-54288]
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor