-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update action name in sidebar when the action's model.name
changes
#1347
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend
|
Project |
RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend
|
Branch Review |
action-sidebar-name
|
Run status |
|
Run duration | 02m 45s |
Commit |
|
Committer | Nick Major |
View all properties for this run ↗︎ |
Test results | |
---|---|
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
312
|
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9251591f-5353-416a-b143-ec48a6808d34Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
test/integration/patients/patient/patient-flow.js (1)
167-170
: Consider using.should('have.text', ...)
for exact text matchTo ensure the test asserts the exact text of the action name, consider using
.should('have.text', 'New Websocket Name')
instead of.should('contain', 'New Websocket Name')
. This makes the test more precise and can prevent false positives if additional text is present.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/js/views/patients/sidebar/action/action-sidebar-action_views.js
(5 hunks)test/integration/patients/patient/patient-flow.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/js/views/patients/sidebar/action/action-sidebar-action_views.js (4)
19-21
: LGTM: Well-structured view component.
The new NameView
follows good practices by being focused, reusable, and consistent with existing styling.
113-113
: LGTM: Clean template refactor.
The change properly moves name rendering to a dedicated region, consistent with Marionette's best practices and the existing pattern in this file.
137-144
: Consider cleanup handling for the name region.
While the change:name
event handler is properly added, consider whether the name region needs cleanup in scenarios like model destruction or view cleanup, similar to how clonedAction
is handled in other parts of the code.
Let's check if other regions have cleanup handling:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for cleanup patterns in the codebase
rg -A 5 "onBeforeDestroy|stopListening|empty\(\)" src/js/views/patients/
Line range hint 1-1
: Verify WebSocket integration for name updates.
The PR objectives mention real-time updates when the action's name changes. Let's verify the WebSocket integration:
✅ Verification successful
WebSocket integration appears to be handled at the application level
Based on the search results, we can see that WebSocket functionality is integrated at the application level through various app files (action-sidebar_app.js
, patient-sidebar_app.js
, etc.). The action updates are managed through the standard Backbone model/collection pattern, where WebSocket events are typically handled by the parent application and propagated through the model layer.
- The action model updates are automatically synchronized through the application's WebSocket infrastructure
- Real-time updates are handled at the app level rather than individual view components
- The view file in question correctly focuses on rendering and doesn't need explicit WebSocket handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WebSocket handling related to action updates
echo "Searching for WebSocket action handlers..."
rg -l "socket|ws|websocket" src/js/apps/patients/
rg -l "action.*update" src/js/apps/patients/
echo "Searching for model update patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'model.set($_, $_)' src/js/apps/patients/
Length of output: 1265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the action-sidebar_app.js since it's likely the main handler for action updates
echo "Checking action-sidebar_app.js for WebSocket handlers:"
rg -A 5 "socket|websocket" src/js/apps/patients/sidebar/action-sidebar_app.js
echo "\nChecking for action update event handlers:"
rg -A 5 "action.*update|updateAction" src/js/apps/patients/sidebar/action-sidebar_app.js
echo "\nChecking for WebSocket event bindings:"
ast-grep --pattern 'this.listenTo($_, "change:$_", $_)' src/js/apps/patients/sidebar/action-sidebar_app.js
Length of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the parent app and state management for WebSocket handling
echo "Checking patient-sidebar_app.js for WebSocket and state management:"
rg -A 5 "socket|websocket|sync" src/js/apps/patients/sidebar/patient-sidebar_app.js
echo "\nChecking for action model and collection definitions:"
rg -A 10 "class.*Action|Collection.*Action" src/js/apps/patients/
echo "\nChecking for sync event handlers in state management:"
rg -A 5 "sync|update" src/js/apps/patients/shared/
Length of output: 1644
test/integration/patients/patient/patient-flow.js (1)
156-165
: WebSocket 'NameChanged' message simulation is correctly implemented
The test accurately simulates a WebSocket NameChanged
message for a patient-action
and verifies that the name
property is updated in the payload as expected.
onChangeName() { | ||
this.showName(); | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify handling of name changes before render.
The implementation looks good, but there might be a race condition if the name changes before the view is rendered. Consider adding a render check in onChangeName
, similar to the onChangeOwner
method:
onChangeName() {
+ if (!this.isRendered()) return;
this.showName();
}
Also applies to: 183-183, 197-199
Shortcut Story ID: [sc-56480]
This should have been included in: #1345. So the name in the action sidebar updates on a
NameChanged
websocket notification.This will likely only happen because of an eval.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
NameView
for displaying patient names, enhancing modularity in the UI.Bug Fixes
Tests