Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document expose-internals removal, bring part of internals back as hazmat #352

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 23, 2023

Conversation

tchebb
Copy link
Contributor

@tchebb tchebb commented Jul 21, 2023

As per the discussion in #351, some of these functions are useful to external users, but we want to make it absolutely clear that they're unsafe. Keep them behind a feature flag for that reason, and additionally add scary documentation inspired by what's already in the aes crate.

Please don't squash when merging if possible; the commits are split appropriately as is.

This contribution is on behalf of my company.

tchebb added 3 commits July 21, 2023 16:53
External access to these functions was removed in RustCrypto#304 when the old
`internals` module and `expose-internals` feature were removed. There
are some valid use cases for them, though (see RustCrypto#351), so let's bring
back a subset of what was in `internals` using the same naming and
documentation conventions that the aes crate uses for its hazardous
functions.

Much of the added or changed documentation is derived from that in aes.

Fixes RustCrypto#351.
Copy link
Member

@tarcieri tarcieri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks

@tarcieri tarcieri requested a review from dignifiedquire July 21, 2023 21:58
@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit eb7e507 into RustCrypto:master Jul 23, 2023
@tchebb tchebb deleted the add-hazmat branch September 29, 2023 18:52
@tarcieri tarcieri mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants