-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sha-1 vs sha1 #438
Comments
by "README points at", I mean the shield and link urls to docs & crates.io etc |
We plan to release I will fix the readme links right away. |
We probably should also add a deprecation note to the |
We can also add a @rustsec unmaintained crate advisory for We should probably do the same for |
I have published |
0.10.5 was a breaking change: snapview/tungstenite-rs#321 |
Yep. This just broke a bunch of unrelated builds downstream. Can we get 0.10.5 yanked? |
This is the same crate, but renamed to be more consistent with the RustCrypto project naming. Some recent discussion is available here: RustCrypto/hashes#438
This is the same crate, but renamed to be more consistent with the RustCrypto project naming. Some recent discussion is available here: RustCrypto/hashes#438
Oh... I forgot to do the lib renaming. I will yank v0.10.5 and will do re-release right away. |
According to this comment the https://crates.io/crates/sha-1 has been deprecated.
I see no indication that it's deprecated on docs.rs, nor crates.io. How is this deprecation meant to be communicated? What's the benefit of the new crate?
Furthermore the README at https://github.com/RustCrypto/hashes/blob/08d677fc9b978320eb3d5c261339f3d72f5f07f6/sha1/README.md appears to point at the
sha-1
crate, notsha1
, making it look like the last version ofsha-1
is the latest version ofsha1
😕The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: