docs(skills): enforce mandatory debate arbitration and audit trail#15
Merged
RyderFreeman4Logos merged 2 commits intomainfrom Feb 9, 2026
Merged
docs(skills): enforce mandatory debate arbitration and audit trail#15RyderFreeman4Logos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
RyderFreeman4Logos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
…r review dismissals [MOTIVATION] Agent was bypassing the debate/arbitration step when dismissing bot review comments as false positives, replying directly with its own reasoning. This undermines the heterogeneous review process where no single model should judge its own code. [IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS] - pr-codex-bot: add FORBIDDEN section prohibiting self-dismissal without debate, strengthen Category B with SOP VIOLATION warnings, mandate full model specs (tool/provider/model/thinking_budget) in all audit trail templates (Steps 8.3a and 8.3b) - debate: add Audit Trail Requirements section with model spec format, add PR Integration section for posting results to PR comments, update Done Criteria with audit trail verification - csa-review: add Disagreement Escalation section requiring debate skill for contested findings, update Done Criteria Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner
Author
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
…odex-bot Previous commit 95f97d5 claimed these changes but they were lost due to Edit tool persistence failure. This commit adds the actually missing content: - FORBIDDEN Actions section (before Parameters) - Category B SOP VIOLATION WARNING (after Category B description) - Step 8.3a audit trail template with mandatory model specs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Merged
5 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
tool/provider/model/thinking_budget) in all audit trail templates (Steps 8.3a and 8.3b).Motivation
Agent bypassed the debate/arbitration step when dismissing bot review comments as false positives, replying directly with its own reasoning. This undermines the heterogeneous review process where no single model should judge its own code.
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code