-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Pylint CI #38
Add Pylint CI #38
Conversation
115226f
to
54d6d35
Compare
@winstonsung 應該 Test 3.11 就好了。Pycord 比較龜毛一點 |
Matrix changed to Python 3.11, 3.12. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pylint.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/pylint.yml (5)
3-6
: Triggers are set up correctly. 🐾This standard setup ensures that the workflow runs on PRs, direct pushes, and can be manually triggered, which is ideal for continuous integration processes.
9-13
: Job setup looks good, but consider broader Python version testing. 🐱The use of
ubuntu-latest
ensures the latest stable environment. However, limiting to Python 3.11 might miss issues in other versions. Consider testing with additional versions if dependencies allow.
15-19
: Python setup is correctly configured. 🐈Using
actions/setup-python@v3
with matrix strategy for the Python version ensures flexibility and consistency across runs.
20-23
: Efficient dependency management. 🐾Upgrading pip before installing packages ensures that the latest features and security fixes of pip are used. The combined pip install command is efficient and reduces the complexity of the workflow script.
24-26
: Consider usingfind
for a more inclusive file selection. 🐱Using
git ls-files '*.py'
limits linting to tracked files. Consider usingfind . -name "*.py"
to include all Python files in the repository, ensuring a more thorough analysis.- pylint $(git ls-files '*.py') + pylint $(find . -name "*.py")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/pylint.yml (1 hunks)
- .pylintrc (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (12)
.github/workflows/pylint.yml (3)
3-6
: LGTM! Good choice of triggers for the workflow.The use of
pull_request
,push
, andworkflow_dispatch
ensures that the code is linted in various scenarios, maintaining code quality.
10-13
: Configuration looks purrfect!Running on
ubuntu-latest
and using Python3.11
is a solid choice for ensuring the workflow is up-to-date.
26-26
: Consider usingfind
instead ofgit ls-files
to ensure all Python files are linted.This approach ensures that all Python files, including those not tracked by Git, are analyzed.
.pylintrc (9)
6-6
: Good choice to disableanalyse-fallback-blocks
.Disabling this prevents false positives in a Python 3-only codebase, keeping lint checks relevant.
11-11
: Enablingclear-cache-post-run
is a wise move.This ensures that each lint run starts fresh, which can help in detecting issues that might be missed otherwise.
77-77
: Settingjobs
to0
to auto-detect processor count is efficient.This allows Pylint to run faster by utilizing available processors optimally.
97-97
: Enabling recursive checking is essential for comprehensive linting.This ensures that all Python files in subdirectories are included, improving the thoroughness of checks.
107-107
: Suggestion mode activation is helpful for developers.This feature provides actionable suggestions instead of just flagging issues, which is great for learning and improving code quality.
327-327
: Setting line-ending format to LF is a good standardization practice.This helps in maintaining consistency across different development environments.
339-339
: Adjustingmax-line-length
to 100 is reasonable.It strikes a balance between readability and allowing sufficient line length for more complex expressions.
456-456
: Specifying timeout methods for requests API is a prudent safety measure.This ensures that methods that can potentially hang are handled properly, improving reliability.
554-554
: Enabling quote consistency checks promotes code uniformity.Consistent use of quotes in a project improves readability and reduces stylistic conflicts.
- C0103 invalid-name - C0303 trailing-whitespace - C0304 missing-final-newline - C0325 superfluous-parens - C0328 unexpected-line-ending-format - C0411 wrong-import-order - R1710 inconsistent-return-statements - W0621 redefined-outer-name - W0622 redefined-builtin Bug: SCAICT#37 Bug: SCAICT#38 Bug: SCAICT#73 Change-Id: Iedd924c8ea2a834f1ccc41d4fa4170f04fb24ed9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/pylint.yml (1 hunks)
- .pylintrc (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
.github/workflows/pylint.yml (2)
3-6
: Purrfect! The trigger events are well-defined.The workflow triggers on pull requests, pushes, and manual dispatches, ensuring comprehensive CI coverage.
13-13
: Consider adding Python 3.12 to the matrix.Ensuring compatibility with the latest Python versions is a good practice.
python-version: [ "3.11", "3.12" ].pylintrc (5)
6-11
: Great configuration updates!The changes to
analyse-fallback-blocks
andclear-cache-post-run
improve compatibility and performance.
119-207
: Consistent naming conventions and helpful hints.The updates to naming styles and the inclusion of naming hints are beneficial.
331-344
: Consistent formatting and readability.The updates to line endings, indentation, and maximum line length are well-chosen.
435-455
: Verify the reasoning behind disabling these checks.Disabling checks for docstrings, line length, and other metrics might reduce code quality. Ensure this aligns with project standards.
467-467
: Good practice to enforce timeouts.Requiring a timeout for specific methods ensures network requests do not hang indefinitely.
Bug: #37
Bug: #38
Change-Id: I2e16cb11fc055c181df8234a8d3004977d352b02
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Configuration
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)