Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merging in SUPA implementation? #20

Closed
dtzWill opened this issue May 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Merging in SUPA implementation? #20

dtzWill opened this issue May 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@dtzWill
Copy link
Contributor

dtzWill commented May 4, 2017

Don't mean to nag, but just a reminder that merging in SUPA implementation would be great and much appreciated! 👍

The SUPA website suggests it's on your TODO, and idea when that will happen? Or is there anything blocking the effort that perhaps folks (such as myself) could help with?

Thanks!

@yuleisui
Copy link
Collaborator

yuleisui commented May 4, 2017

SUPA will not be merged at this stage. It involves a company IP. We will see how it goes before merging it. You may keep it for private use now.

@dtzWill
Copy link
Contributor Author

dtzWill commented May 4, 2017

Okay, thanks and appreciate the explanation and quick response! Have a good one! :)

@dtzWill dtzWill closed this as completed May 4, 2017
yuleisui added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2019
pts printer and gep obj creator
jumormt pushed a commit to jumormt/SVF-xiao that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2024
remove isnonpointer obj in pta
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants