preserving PRT result as part of github comment & PRT pass/fail label

[omkarkhatavkar]

Problem Statement

Currently, the PRT result gets clean after a new commit and there is no way for PR to know what happened with the result. PRT passed/failed labels also need to be added automatically this helps in reviewing the PR quickly and merging them

Solution

Add the dispatch workflow that takes care of this thing from the Jenkins CI update the GitHub comment with all details and apply the filter.

Testing

I was able to test this on the my fork of robottelo here https://github.com/omkarkhatavkar/robottelo/actions/runs/7755989443/job/21152444058

[synkd]

This is a very useful addition to the Robottelo GH actions. I think it's a great idea to preserve the history of PRT requests in a PR's comments. However, I do have a few questions about your test results in omkarkhatavkar#158:

• In that PR, the build number for each run is reported as 10. Is this due to repeatedly retriggering the same check from the same PRT run?
• There's some inconsistency in the reported build status, with a mix of SUCCESS, FAILURE, and UNSTABLE reported for a build with a failed test. It looks like your most recent testing has converged on this result being reported as UNSTABLE, which I think is fine. But would it be possible to see results from a build showing a status of SUCCESS when all tests have passed?
• Which user account(s) will post the results comment to PRs when this is merged into Robottelo?

[omkarkhatavkar]

This is a very useful addition to the Robottelo GH actions. I think it's a great idea to preserve the history of PRT requests in a PR's comments. However, I do have a few questions about your test results in omkarkhatavkar#158:

Thanks for seeing value in this PR (Contribution)

• In that PR, the build number for each run is reported as 10. Is this due to repeatedly retriggering the same check from the same PRT run?

I was testing this that's why it would have repeatedly shown build number 10, In real case it will be the build number coming from the Jenkins PRT run.

• There's some inconsistency in the reported build status, with a mix of SUCCESS, FAILURE, and UNSTABLE reported for a build with a failed test. It looks like your most recent testing has converged on this result being reported as UNSTABLE, which I think is fine. But would it be possible to see results from a build showing a status of SUCCESS when all tests have passed?

I was just testing some dummy data, But the thumb rule is that if the test passes without any issues and the build is a Success it will present the label as PRT Passed, else PRT Failed. Adding more color code will look a bit better

• Which user account(s) will post the results comment to PRs when this is merged into Robottelo?

The result will be posted by the token which I'm using here which is SatelliteQE user.

[omkarkhatavkar]

omkarkhatavkar#158 (comment) This one the last comment by me. I think this looks much better as well

[jyejare]

Looks Great! Some nitpick comments.

[jyejare]

I have an ACK.

[omkarkhatavkar]

@jyejare Can we merge this beast ?

[jyejare]

ACK pending comment !

[omkarkhatavkar]

@jyejare Could you please create labels for "PRT-Passed" and "PRT-Failed"? Please choose some nice colours to represent them.

[jyejare]

@omkarkhatavkar Added the labels for both! Now we should be good to merge if no complaints !!