Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: replace OrdinaryDiffEq with OrdinaryDiffEqCore #598

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

oameye
Copy link
Contributor

@oameye oameye commented Jan 22, 2025

resolves #596

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@oameye
Copy link
Contributor Author

oameye commented Jan 22, 2025

I guess the IntegrationTests should be dealt with downstream. The CI / test (Interface2, pre) test seem to fail due to a seed being different on CI then locally or something. Seems unrelated to the PR.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

yeah that one is slightly stochastic.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit d74d85d into SciML:master Jan 22, 2025
31 of 35 checks passed
@oameye
Copy link
Contributor Author

oameye commented Jan 25, 2025

Shall we tag a new release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Does StochasticDiffEq need the full OrdinaryDiffEq dependency?
2 participants