Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code coverage #141
Code coverage #141
Changes from all commits
ff92ccc
22dec67
663f5b5
eec2d8a
c8fdcae
1782394
02d6b2a
751a377
fb8143d
86a23d4
b5f2cd4
153ee7d
ad35375
7510df4
6427f65
74b7f55
fa6cc04
8bcc840
94ae424
d7042b1
35bb3a8
d315b65
2d509f9
d9fb588
4db9282
3bd7978
cd6aac8
5ffb6fb
4b133a0
179628c
37281dd
27ba597
7fa107f
7c6706c
115dbea
9fa7a92
f23b2c8
39ac4be
64b11b5
c9e54a5
fae9b8b
0c6de2c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sure to add this method to the
exclude-members
list foHasLength
indocs/api/resolutions.rst
!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be clear, should we be doing that with all the others as well? None of the resolutions are currently excluding the
x_to_log
properties. I would imagine we want to be consistent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at the published docs, I don't see any of the
x_to_log
properties being displayed for the other resolutions.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, it's because none of the Resolutions have
:members:
directive, which is obvious to me now because we don't actually have any methods on resolutions (yet).I see you added those directives, but now i'm wondering—should we add the directives to exclude those members just in case we someday do add the
:members:
directive, or should we just assume Resolutions will never have methods on them?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had similar thought, but I wasn't sure. Is that pattern going to fit every Resolution?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we can remove the
:exclude-members:
directives that you added. I didn't look before i asked for this; having just done a bunch of editing Actions documentation i just assumed we needed it.I'd rather be consistent for now and deal with that when we need to.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are removed.