Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bazel] Bump the JS rules to latest versions #14512

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

shs96c
Copy link
Member

@shs96c shs96c commented Sep 17, 2024

PR Type

dependencies


Description

  • Updated several JavaScript-related Bazel dependencies to their latest versions to ensure compatibility and leverage new features.
  • Changes include updates to aspect_bazel_lib, aspect_rules_esbuild, aspect_rules_js, and aspect_rules_ts.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
MODULE.bazel
Update JavaScript-related Bazel dependencies to latest versions

MODULE.bazel

  • Updated version of aspect_bazel_lib from 2.7.9 to 2.8.1.
  • Updated version of aspect_rules_esbuild from 0.20.1 to 0.21.0.
  • Updated version of aspect_rules_js from 1.42.3 to 2.0.1.
  • Updated version of aspect_rules_ts from 2.4.2 to 3.1.0.
  • +4/-4     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @qodo-merge-pro qodo-merge-pro bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Review effort [1-5]: 1 labels Sep 17, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No key issues to review

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Maintainability
    Add comments to explain the reason for dependency updates

    Consider adding comments to explain the reason for updating these dependencies and
    any potential impacts on the project. This can help other developers understand the
    changes and their implications.

    MODULE.bazel [4-7]

    +# Updated to latest versions for improved features and bug fixes
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_bazel_lib", version = "2.8.1")
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_rules_esbuild", version = "0.21.0")
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_rules_js", version = "2.0.1")
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_rules_ts", version = "3.1.0")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding comments to explain the reason for updating dependencies can improve code maintainability and help other developers understand the changes, but it is not crucial for the functionality.

    7
    Group related dependencies together for better organization

    Consider grouping related dependencies together for better organization and
    readability. In this case, you could group all the Aspect-related dependencies.

    MODULE.bazel [3-8]

     bazel_dep(name = "apple_rules_lint", version = "0.4.0")
    +
    +# Aspect dependencies
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_bazel_lib", version = "2.8.1")
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_rules_esbuild", version = "0.21.0")
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_rules_js", version = "2.0.1")
     bazel_dep(name = "aspect_rules_ts", version = "3.1.0")
    +
     bazel_dep(name = "bazel_features", version = "1.13.0")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: Grouping related dependencies improves code readability and organization, which is beneficial for maintainability, but it is a minor improvement and not essential for the code's functionality.

    6

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Review effort [1-5]: 1
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant