Update workflows for build-resources v4#68
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review - mapper-file PRI'll analyze the pull request diff against the review checklist. Code Quality✅ Code follows style guideThe changes follow YAML formatting conventions and improve consistency by:
✅ No commented-out codeOnly one comment was removed from ✅ Meaningful variable namesAll variable/key names are clear and follow GitHub Actions conventions:
✅ DRY principle followedThe PR refactors workflow files to use centralized templates ( ✅ No defects identifiedChanges are primarily:
Minor Issue - ✅ Project memory complianceThe changes don't affect Testing
|
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll analyze this pull request diff against the provided checklist. Code Review AnalysisCode Quality
Testing
Documentation
Security
SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED WITH MINOR NOTE This is a well-executed infrastructure update that:
Minor Note:
No blocking issues found. The changes improve maintainability and fix actual bugs in the GitHub Actions workflows.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
Summary
SENZING_MEMBERS→MEMBERS, etc.).outputs.job-statuswith.resultpull-requestspermission towritein lint-repo.yamlSLACK_CHANNELsecret to slack notification callers@v3/@v2build-resources references to@v4kernelsamandcooldownto cspell dictionary