Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gfycat API #769

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2023
Merged

Gfycat API #769

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2023

Conversation

OMEGARAZER
Copy link
Contributor

Moves Gfycat to use API via site access key.

Adds cachetools as dependency to reuse API keys for Gfycat/Redgifs at 95% of their TTL. Include tests to verify caching.

Updates versions of requests/yt-dlp/black/isort/pytest.

Added default timeout to requests calls.

Adds validate-pyproject and blacken-docs to pre-commit as well as updates versions.

Moves Gfycat to use API via site access key.

Adds cachetools as dependency to reuse API keys for Gfycat/Redgifs at 95% of their TTL. Include tests to verify caching.

Updates versions of requests/yt-dlp/black/isort/pytest.

Added default timeout to requests calls.

Adds validate-pyproject and blacken-docs to pre-commit as well as updates versions.
@OMEGARAZER
Copy link
Contributor Author

Was there anything else needed for this or any input?

@aliparlakci @Serene-Arc

@Serene-Arc
Copy link
Owner

@OMEGARAZER in the future, I'd prefer that you do these changes in separate PRs. Each of the lines in your summary should be a separate PR as they are unrelated. Moving forwards I won't merge PRs like this because they really confuse the process and git history. They also make reviewing PRs a lot harder, fyi.

@Serene-Arc Serene-Arc merged commit 0051877 into Serene-Arc:development Feb 12, 2023
@OMEGARAZER OMEGARAZER deleted the gfycat-api branch February 12, 2023 01:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants