Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix compiling on staging branch #97

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 25, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Felanbird
Copy link

@Felanbird Felanbird commented Jun 25, 2022

I believe this workaround change is causing your issue.

Related: Chatterino#3664 (comment) - I assume the staged-release branch you created was annotated.

@AnatoleAM
Copy link

Uuuhh i'm confused why it compiled before but it failed only now

@Felanbird
Copy link
Author

🤷 maybe u didn't annotate the branch, but gh actions did it for you?

@AnatoleAM
Copy link

uh, perhaps, i am not actually sure what you mean by annotating the branch

@Felanbird
Copy link
Author

Meant to say tag* but I'm not sure on it either actually. 🤔

@Felanbird
Copy link
Author

Felanbird commented Jun 25, 2022

Annotated tags are created using the -a flag. The difference between regular tag to annotated tag is that the annotated tag is like a commit, it contain the date, author and the message attached to it.

thanks stackoverflow

@Felanbird
Copy link
Author

Felanbird commented Jun 25, 2022

If I'm understanding the stackoverflow answer, using --tags specifically in our use-case, seems to be a workaround to getting the correct info when a tag is not annotated, so that's the "reason" it was implemented on this repo, but when I attempted to use this logic on upstream pajlada corrected it and just created a new annotated tag 2.3.5.

So when you created the branch, the --tags approach worked correctly, but when Github actions annotated it (can't confirm it did so but assuming), that broke it [but in reality just put it to the standard upstream uses].

@AnatoleAM
Copy link

AnatoleAM commented Jun 25, 2022

Ah alright. I'll merge this then and hopefully it's fine - this branch is temporary anyway it's only for testing the simulated v2 on the new API.

@AnatoleAM AnatoleAM merged commit f957dac into SevenTV:anatole/stage Jun 25, 2022
@Felanbird Felanbird deleted the patch-2 branch June 25, 2022 19:12
@Felanbird
Copy link
Author

Honestly I didn't fully look at what change your made relevant to the paints PR - I saw the ❌ and immediately looked into what failed, not seeing that this wasn't fully necessary as you just stripped pull-request: from the file. 😁

@AnatoleAM
Copy link

Yeah it wasn't actually meant to touch that PR, that branch is just there because it's faster to use github ci than to spin up VMs for each system I'd want it to compile for

JAB-dev pushed a commit to JAB-dev/chatterino7WithDirtyFileUpload that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants