Skip to content

Comparing WebSocket, WebRTC, and WebTransport under packet loss

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Sh3b0/realtime-web

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

34 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

realtime-web

Experimenting with WebSocket, WebRTC, and WebTransport by streaming 2500 coordinates from server to client to visualize.

Checkout the discussion on HackerNews

Demos

0% Packet loss
1.mp4
15% Packet loss (unreliable WebRTC/WebTransport)
2.mp4
15% Packet loss (reliable WebRTC/WebTransport)
3.mp4

Experiment details

All servers are written in Go and hosted locally. All connections use HTTPS with self-signed certificates, connection establishment period is excluded from the time graph.

In the first experiment, WebRTC data channel and WebTransport server are operating in unreliable modes, undelivered packets are not retransmitted. However, since the network is reliable, we can see almost no performance differences between the protocols.

In the second experiment, WebRTC data channel and WebTransport server are still operating in unreliable modes, but any packet may be dropped with a probability of 15%. We can see WebSocket performance starting to suffer due to TCP head-of-line blocking. Results varied over multiple runs, with WebTransport constantly managing to deliver more messages than WebRTC.

In the third experiment, all protocols are operating in reliable modes. WebRTC uses a maxRetransmission value of 5 and WebTransport server uses a server-initiated unidirectional stream. Interestingly, WebTransport maintained a very stable and efficient behavior while WebRTC suffered what looks like a sender-side head-of-line blocking.

Additional notes:

Local testing

  1. Clone repo

    git clone https://github.com/Sh3B0/realtime-web.git
    cd realtime-web
  2. Create locally trusted certs using mkcert

    mkdir certs && cd certs
    mkcert -install
    mkcert localhost
  3. Run a server (use similar commands for webtransport and webrtc)

    ./run.sh websocket
  4. Simulating packet loss (use del instead of add to remove rules)

    sudo tc qdisc add dev lo root netem loss 15%
  5. Run client

    ./run.sh client
    chromium --origin-to-force-quic-on=localhost:8001 http://localhost:3000