Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug Fix] Restrict AST checker on Boolean Variable #256

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 16, 2024

Conversation

Fanjia-Yan
Copy link
Collaborator

@Fanjia-Yan Fanjia-Yan commented Mar 12, 2024

This PR removes any AST checker answers that contain the string literals "True" and "False", thereby restricting the conditionals of the AST checker to strictly boolean value.

Example:

[true, "true"] -> [true]

This PR will stack on top of #252

Will this change the results of leaderboard? YES

#253 will updated the leaderboard with this fix.

@ShishirPatil ShishirPatil merged commit b009a07 into ShishirPatil:main Mar 16, 2024
devanshamin pushed a commit to devanshamin/gorilla that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
This PR removes any AST checker answers that contain the string literals
"True" and "False", thereby restricting the conditionals of the AST
checker to strictly boolean value.

Example:

`[true, "true"] -> [true]`

This PR will stack on top of ShishirPatil#252

Will this change the results of leaderboard? YES

ShishirPatil#253 will updated the
leaderboard with this fix.
aw632 pushed a commit to vinaybagade/gorilla that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
This PR removes any AST checker answers that contain the string literals
"True" and "False", thereby restricting the conditionals of the AST
checker to strictly boolean value.

Example:

`[true, "true"] -> [true]`

This PR will stack on top of ShishirPatil#252

Will this change the results of leaderboard? YES

ShishirPatil#253 will updated the
leaderboard with this fix.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants