We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tapioca currently factors Etc.nprocessors into its worker count calculation:
Etc.nprocessors
tapioca/lib/tapioca/executor.rb
Lines 17 to 20 in 703ce22
However, the parallel gem currently prioritizes ENV['PARALLEL_PROCESSOR_COUNT'] above nprocessors. This affects environments like Spin, where most gems pick up the processor count and limit their process usage accordingly.
parallel
ENV['PARALLEL_PROCESSOR_COUNT']
nprocessors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
PARALLEL_PROCESSOR_COUNT
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Tapioca currently factors
Etc.nprocessors
into its worker count calculation:tapioca/lib/tapioca/executor.rb
Lines 17 to 20 in 703ce22
However, the
parallel
gem currently prioritizesENV['PARALLEL_PROCESSOR_COUNT']
abovenprocessors
. This affects environments like Spin, where most gems pick up the processor count and limit their process usage accordingly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: