Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add recipe book syntaxes #617

Closed
4 of 6 tasks
Legoman99573 opened this issue Jun 2, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed
4 of 6 tasks

Add recipe book syntaxes #617

Legoman99573 opened this issue Jun 2, 2017 · 9 comments
Labels
enhancement Feature request, an issue about something that could be improved, or a PR improving something. priority: lowest "Nice to have" updates that are not required (tiny low impact bug fixes or QoL enhancements).

Comments

@Legoman99573
Copy link
Contributor

Legoman99573 commented Jun 2, 2017

I know this doesn't count as a bug, but could be of a reference of what will be missing in 1.12 release

Others I can't think of right now. If you can edit, you can add others if needed. This can make a good milestone for 1.12.

@bensku bensku added the enhancement Feature request, an issue about something that could be improved, or a PR improving something. label Jun 2, 2017
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 2, 2017

also, illusioner. : )

@Legoman99573
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nshun1896 Added

bensku added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2017
@bensku
Copy link
Member

bensku commented Jun 11, 2017

Not all of these will be complete for next release. Advancements, for example, are not exactly easy to implement properly.

bensku added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2017
@Legoman99573
Copy link
Contributor Author

Legoman99573 commented Jun 13, 2017

How about the crafting recipe book one? It probably won't be as confusing if it has a proper API to handle it.

@jaylawl
Copy link
Contributor

jaylawl commented Aug 30, 2017

@bensku Advancements are amazing! But Mojang is reworking advancements for 1.13, so you better check if working on this before 1.13 would be worth your time at all :)

@TheBentoBox
Copy link
Member

Where did they say they're reworking advancements @jaylawl ? I keep up-to-date on upcoming changes pretty religiously and I haven't heard of that nor is it listed on the wiki page for 1.13. They're changing TONS of stuff with commands, block ID's, and data values, but not with advancements as far as I can tell.

@jaylawl
Copy link
Contributor

jaylawl commented Aug 30, 2017

@TheBentoBox https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/1.13 its going to be part of the upcoming data-packs is what i meant

@TheBentoBox
Copy link
Member

That's not an actual change to advancements at all though, it's just a change to how players can store them to package them with other data-driven game elements. I don't believe it should matter in any way that's relevant to Skript but it's still good that you pointed it out for us to keep in mind.

@bensku bensku added this to the 2.3 milestone Sep 20, 2017
@Snow-Pyon Snow-Pyon added the priority: medium Issues that are detrimental to user experience (prohibitive bugs or lack of useful implementation). label Jan 31, 2018
@bensku bensku removed this from the 2.3 milestone Mar 2, 2019
@TPGamesNL TPGamesNL changed the title 1.12 missing features Add recipe book syntaxes Jun 19, 2021
@TPGamesNL TPGamesNL added priority: lowest "Nice to have" updates that are not required (tiny low impact bug fixes or QoL enhancements). and removed priority: medium Issues that are detrimental to user experience (prohibitive bugs or lack of useful implementation). labels Jun 19, 2021
@TheLimeGlass
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing in favor of #5261 as there is only book recipes left.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Feature request, an issue about something that could be improved, or a PR improving something. priority: lowest "Nice to have" updates that are not required (tiny low impact bug fixes or QoL enhancements).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants