Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update env and remove useless comment #676

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

LawyZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

@LawyZheng LawyZheng commented Aug 6, 2024

🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 3b525f1

Summary:

Added SECONDARY_LLM_KEY to .env.example and removed a redundant comment from handle_select_option_action in skyvern/webeye/actions/handler.py.

Key points:

  • Added SECONDARY_LLM_KEY to .env.example for specifying a secondary LLM provider.
  • Removed a redundant comment from skyvern/webeye/actions/handler.py in the handle_select_option_action function.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 3b525f1 in 45 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 27 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .env.example:35
  • Draft comment:
    The addition of SECONDARY_LLM_KEY with a clear comment explaining its purpose is a good practice, ensuring future maintainability and clarity for other developers.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The new environment variable SECONDARY_LLM_KEY is added to the .env.example file. The comment above this variable explains its purpose, which is to specify a cheaper LLM provider for small tasks. This is a reasonable addition if the application's architecture supports using different LLM providers based on the task complexity or cost considerations. The comment is clear and provides enough context for understanding the use of this variable.
2. skyvern/webeye/actions/handler.py:550
  • Draft comment:
    Removing the TODO comment is a good cleanup practice, especially if the functionality it suggests is either implemented or no longer considered necessary.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The removal of the commented TODO line in the handle_select_option_action function is a cleanup task. The TODO comment suggests taking a screenshot for every tree head element to figure out which is the dropdown menu. This might have been a debugging or development aid that is no longer needed. Removing such comments can help in reducing clutter and confusion in the codebase, especially if the functionality is either implemented or deemed unnecessary.

Workflow ID: wflow_YpSjZss7rGGryYz6


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@LawyZheng LawyZheng merged commit 76ae23c into main Aug 6, 2024
2 checks passed
@LawyZheng LawyZheng deleted the update-env-and-remove-useless-comment branch August 6, 2024 05:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant