-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SONARPY-2290 Support decorators for FunctionType to descriptors converter #2125
Conversation
1d0a237
to
91fb255
Compare
759e9d2
to
a5e22df
Compare
44d3051
to
a1f9d45
Compare
a1f9d45
to
c99a4e4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
I think it would be good to add a test to document the inconsistent behavior between decorators coming from Protobuf and the others, as well as having a ticket for it.
"abc.abstractmethod", | ||
"abstractmethod", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add (either in ProjectLevelTypeTableTest
or ProjectLevelSymbolTableTest
, or any relevant place) a test that highlights the discrepancies between decorator properly resolved from Typeshed (where I assume we only get a local name) and the case where a proper FQN is resolved?
We should also have a ticket to track this.
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
20f960f
into
MMF-3945
SONARPY-2290