Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Sweep Rules] Fix inconsistent coding style and formatting in subprocessor.py #48

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sweep-ai[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@sweep-ai sweep-ai bot commented Nov 9, 2023

PR Feedback (click)

  • 👍 Sweep Did Well
  • 👎 Sweep Needs Improvement

I created this PR to address this rule:

"Code should follow a consistent coding style and formatting."

Description

This PR fixes the inconsistent coding style and formatting in the subprocessor.py file. The following changes were made:

  • Indented the leakreplay function and its wrapper function leakreplay_wrapper properly with four spaces, aligning them with the other functions in the file.
  • Added a blank line between the toxicity_wrapper function and the leakreplay_wrapper function to maintain consistency with the existing code.

Summary of Changes

  • Indented the leakreplay function and its wrapper function leakreplay_wrapper properly with four spaces.
  • Added a blank line between the toxicity_wrapper function and the leakreplay_wrapper function.

Copy link
Contributor Author

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Rollback Files For Sweep

  • Rollback changes to pulling_ace/utils/subprocessor.py

@sweep-ai sweep-ai bot added the sweep label Nov 9, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Sandbox Executions

Copy link
Contributor Author

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 9, 2023

The command:
Run pipenv run black --check .
yielded the following error:
`##[error]Process completed with exit code 123.
##[group]Run docker build . -t pulling_ace:test
�[36;1mdocker build . -t pulling_ace:test�[0m
shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
##[endgroup]
#0 building with "default" instance using docker driver

#1 [internal] load .dockerignore
#1 transferring context: 145B done
#1 DONE 0.0s

#2 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile
#2 transferring dockerfile: 1.22kB done
#2 DONE 0.0s

#3 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/python:3.10-slim
#3 ...

#4 [auth] library/python:pull token for registry-1.docker.io
#4 DONE 0.0s

#3 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/python:3.10-slim
#3 DONE 0.8s

#5 [internal] load build context
#5 DONE 0.0s

#6 [base 1/1] FROM docker.io/library/python:3.10-slim@sha256:3c9182c6498d7de6044be04fb1785ba3a04f953d515d45e5007e8be1c15fdd34
#6 resolve docker.io/library/python:3.10-slim@sha256:3c9182c6498d7de6044be04fb1785ba3a04f953d515d45e5007e8be1c15fdd34 done
#6 sha256:3c9182c6498d7de6044be04fb1785ba3a04f953d515d45e5007e8be1c15fdd34 1.65kB / 1.65kB done
#6 sha256:9a5af4ca0c7678180db9bab26506d0f8959e5a6c32cc5349b7bdcd712790c0f3 1.37kB / 1.37kB done
#6 sha256:a9e021b7cfa1ac0b0cb401c04110e523878b46276735710ce120f940e9523700 6.94kB / 6.94kB done
#6 CANCELED

#5 [internal] load build context
#5 transferring context: 252.52kB done
#5 DONE 0.0s

#7 [python-deps 3/7] WORKDIR /app
#7 CACHED

#8 [python-deps 1/7] COPY Pipfile Pipfile.lock /app/
#8 CACHED

#9 [python-deps 2/7] COPY . /app
#9 CACHED

#10 [python-deps 4/7] COPY pulling_ace /app/pulling_ace
#10 ERROR: failed to calculate checksum of ref 5ee0a90d-9ba7-4120-a52c-7d8898402fd7::ls8fomjfixby3yo7menwt6gil: "/pulling_ace": not found

[python-deps 4/7] COPY pulling_ace /app/pulling_ace:


Dockerfile:19

17 |
18 | # Copy the pulling_ace directory into the Docker image
19 | >>> COPY pulling_ace /app/pulling_ace
20 |
21 | # Install pipenv and compilation dependencies

ERROR: failed to solve: failed to compute cache key: failed to calculate checksum of ref 5ee0a90d-9ba7-4120-a52c-7d8898402fd7::ls8fomjfixby3yo7menwt6gil: "/pulling_ace": not found
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.`
Here are the logs:

would reformat pulling_ace/cli.py
error: cannot format pulling_ace/utils/subprocessor.py: Cannot parse: 199:4:     print(f"Failed to execute command. Error: {e}")

Oh no! 💥 💔 💥
1 file would be reformatted, 18 files would be left unchanged, 1 file would fail to reformat.

Copy link
Contributor Author

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 9, 2023

The command:
Run pipenv run mypy pulling_ace/**/*.py
yielded the following error:
##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.
Here are the logs:

pulling_ace/utils/subprocessor.py:199: error: expected an indented block after 'except' statement on line 198  [syntax]
Found 1 error in 1 file (errors prevented further checking)

Copy link
Contributor Author

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 9, 2023

🚀 Wrote Changes

Done.

Copy link
Contributor Author

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 9, 2023

🚀 Wrote Changes

I wasn't able to make changes. This could be due to an unclear request or a bug in my code.
As a reminder, comments on a file only modify that file. Comments on a PR (at the bottom of the "conversation" tab) can modify the entire PR. Please try again or contact us on Discord

@sweep-ai sweep-ai bot closed this Nov 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant