support for L?[x] list access syntax #262
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I renamed the current
IndexKind
enum toPropertyAccessKind
purely based off of the fact that somewhere in the byond ref both procs and vars are referred to as a datum's "properties" and I had no better name ideas.The checker treats conditional list accesses exactly the same as normal ones. I was going to add some linting stuff for them but their expected behaviour is completely up in the air at the moment (see http://www.byond.com/forum/post/2667247.)