Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding missing ImNodes bindings #167

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2023
Merged

Adding missing ImNodes bindings #167

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2023

Conversation

brunopj1
Copy link
Contributor

@brunopj1 brunopj1 commented Mar 8, 2023

Description

Adds some missing bindings for ImNodes.
Fixes issue #161

Type of change

  • Minor changes or tweaks (quality of life stuff)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

@SpaiR SpaiR added the feat New feature or request label Mar 8, 2023
@SpaiR
Copy link
Owner

SpaiR commented Mar 9, 2023

Thank you for the contribution, LGTM!

@SpaiR SpaiR merged commit 70442b6 into SpaiR:main Mar 9, 2023
@SpaiR SpaiR mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2023
Closed
@brunopj1 brunopj1 mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2023
Closed
@brunopj1
Copy link
Contributor Author

brunopj1 commented Mar 9, 2023

Thank you for the contribution, LGTM!

I've noticed that you still haven't released a new version with these changes.
Do you plan on releasing it any time soon?

Thanks in advance.

@SpaiR
Copy link
Owner

SpaiR commented Mar 9, 2023

@brunopj1 I was planning to do it a bit later. Tomorrow, I guess.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feat New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@brunopj1 @SpaiR