Added Function calls in cats page #49
Conversation
2. Fixed Footer and UI changes.
WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant InteractionClient
participant SmartContract
User->>InteractionClient: Enter input (e.g., mint amount)
User->>InteractionClient: Click action button (e.g., Mint)
InteractionClient->>SmartContract: Call contract function (e.g., mint)
SmartContract-->>InteractionClient: Return transaction hash
InteractionClient->>SmartContract: Wait for receipt
SmartContract-->>InteractionClient: Transaction confirmed
InteractionClient-->>User: Update UI with status/result
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
web/src/app/[cat]/InteractionClient.tsx (2)
338-350:⚠️ Potential issueApply similar fixes for threshold supply reduction.
The threshold supply reduction has the same issues as max supply - misleading labels and missing validation.
364-376:⚠️ Potential issueApply similar fixes for max expansion rate reduction.
The max expansion rate reduction has the same issues. Additionally, ensure the percentage to basis points conversion is handled correctly.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
web/src/app/[cat]/InteractionClient.tsx (2)
13-13: Remove unused Dialog imports.The
Dialog,DialogContent,DialogHeader,DialogTitle, andDialogTriggercomponents are imported but not used in the component.-import { Dialog, DialogContent, DialogHeader, DialogTitle, DialogTrigger } from "@/components/ui/dialog";
39-40: Remove unused state variables.The
transferAmountandtransferTostate variables are declared but never used in the component.- const [transferAmount, setTransferAmount] = useState(""); - const [transferTo, setTransferTo] = useState("");
| // Contract write hooks | ||
| const { writeContract: mint, data: mintData } = useWriteContract(); | ||
|
|
||
| const { writeContract: reduceMaxSupply, data: reduceMaxSupplyData } = useWriteContract(); | ||
|
|
||
| const { writeContract: reduceThresholdSupply, data: reduceThresholdSupplyData } = useWriteContract(); | ||
|
|
||
| const { writeContract: reduceMaxExpansionRate, data: reduceMaxExpansionRateData } = useWriteContract(); | ||
|
|
||
| const { writeContract: disableTransferRestriction, data: disableTransferRestrictionData } = useWriteContract(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Transaction hooks | ||
| const { isLoading: isMinting } = useWaitForTransactionReceipt({ | ||
| hash: mintData, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const { isLoading: isReducingMaxSupply } = useWaitForTransactionReceipt({ | ||
| hash: reduceMaxSupplyData, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const { isLoading: isReducingThresholdSupply } = useWaitForTransactionReceipt({ | ||
| hash: reduceThresholdSupplyData, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const { isLoading: isReducingMaxExpansionRate } = useWaitForTransactionReceipt({ | ||
| hash: reduceMaxExpansionRateData, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const { isLoading: isDisablingTransferRestriction } = useWaitForTransactionReceipt({ | ||
| hash: disableTransferRestrictionData, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add transaction success and error handling.
The component tracks loading states but doesn't handle transaction success or errors. Users need feedback when their transactions complete or fail.
Consider using the transaction receipt hooks to provide user feedback:
const { isLoading: isMinting, isSuccess: isMintSuccess, isError: isMintError } = useWaitForTransactionReceipt({
hash: mintData,
});
// Add useEffect to handle success/error states
useEffect(() => {
if (isMintSuccess) {
alert("Tokens minted successfully!");
setMintAmount("");
getTokenDetails(); // Refresh token details
}
if (isMintError) {
alert("Minting failed. Please try again.");
}
}, [isMintSuccess, isMintError]);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In web/src/app/[cat]/InteractionClient.tsx between lines 146 and 176, the
transaction hooks track loading states but lack handling for transaction success
and errors, which is necessary for user feedback. Update each
useWaitForTransactionReceipt hook to also destructure isSuccess and isError
flags. Then, add useEffect hooks for each transaction to listen for these flags
and trigger appropriate user notifications, such as alerts on success or
failure, and perform any needed state updates or data refreshes accordingly.
| <Button | ||
| onClick={() => reduceMaxSupply({ | ||
| abi: CONTRIBUTION_ACCOUNTING_TOKEN_ABI, | ||
| address: tokenAddress, | ||
| functionName: "reduceMaxSupply", | ||
| args: [parseEther(newMaxSupply)] | ||
| })} | ||
| disabled={!newMaxSupply || isReducingMaxSupply} | ||
| className="w-full h-12 text-lg" | ||
| > | ||
| {isReducingMaxSupply ? "Updating..." : "Update Max Supply"} | ||
| </Button> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify UI labels and add validation for reduction operations.
The contract function reduceMaxSupply implies a one-way reduction, but the UI label "Update Max Supply" could mislead users into thinking they can increase it. Additionally, there's no validation to ensure the new value is actually lower than the current value.
+ <Label htmlFor="newMaxSupply" className="text-lg">Reduce Max Supply (Current: {tokenDetails.maxSupply})</Label>
<Input
id="newMaxSupply"
type="number"
- placeholder="Enter new max supply"
+ placeholder="Enter new max supply (must be lower)"
value={newMaxSupply}
onChange={(e) => setNewMaxSupply(e.target.value)}
className="h-12 text-lg"
/>
<Button
- onClick={() => reduceMaxSupply({
+ onClick={() => {
+ const newValue = parseFloat(newMaxSupply);
+ if (isNaN(newValue) || newValue <= 0) {
+ alert("Please enter a valid positive amount");
+ return;
+ }
+ if (newValue >= tokenDetails.maxSupply) {
+ alert("New max supply must be lower than current value");
+ return;
+ }
+ reduceMaxSupply({
abi: CONTRIBUTION_ACCOUNTING_TOKEN_ABI,
address: tokenAddress,
functionName: "reduceMaxSupply",
args: [parseEther(newMaxSupply)]
- })}
+ })
+ }}
disabled={!newMaxSupply || isReducingMaxSupply}
className="w-full h-12 text-lg"
>
- {isReducingMaxSupply ? "Updating..." : "Update Max Supply"}
+ {isReducingMaxSupply ? "Reducing..." : "Reduce Max Supply"}
</Button>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In web/src/app/[cat]/InteractionClient.tsx around lines 314 to 326, the button
label "Update Max Supply" is misleading because the function only allows
reducing the max supply. Change the button label to something like "Reduce Max
Supply" to clarify this. Also, add validation before enabling the button to
ensure the newMaxSupply value is strictly less than the current max supply,
disabling the button otherwise to prevent invalid operations.
| onClick={() => mint({ | ||
| abi: CONTRIBUTION_ACCOUNTING_TOKEN_ABI, | ||
| address: tokenAddress, | ||
| functionName: "mint", | ||
| args: [address, parseEther(mintAmount)] | ||
| })} | ||
| disabled={!mintAmount || isMinting} | ||
| className="w-full h-12 text-lg" | ||
| > | ||
| {isMinting ? "Minting..." : "Mint Tokens"} | ||
| </Button> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation and error handling for minting.
The mint function should validate inputs before execution:
- Check if the user is connected (address is defined)
- Validate that mintAmount is a positive number
- Handle potential parsing errors
<Button
onClick={() => {
+ if (!address) {
+ alert("Please connect your wallet");
+ return;
+ }
+ const amount = parseFloat(mintAmount);
+ if (isNaN(amount) || amount <= 0) {
+ alert("Please enter a valid positive amount");
+ return;
+ }
mint({
abi: CONTRIBUTION_ACCOUNTING_TOKEN_ABI,
address: tokenAddress,
functionName: "mint",
args: [address, parseEther(mintAmount)]
})
}}
disabled={!mintAmount || isMinting}
className="w-full h-12 text-lg"
>
{isMinting ? "Minting..." : "Mint Tokens"}
</Button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| onClick={() => mint({ | |
| abi: CONTRIBUTION_ACCOUNTING_TOKEN_ABI, | |
| address: tokenAddress, | |
| functionName: "mint", | |
| args: [address, parseEther(mintAmount)] | |
| })} | |
| disabled={!mintAmount || isMinting} | |
| className="w-full h-12 text-lg" | |
| > | |
| {isMinting ? "Minting..." : "Mint Tokens"} | |
| </Button> | |
| </div> | |
| <Button | |
| onClick={() => { | |
| if (!address) { | |
| alert("Please connect your wallet"); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const amount = parseFloat(mintAmount); | |
| if (isNaN(amount) || amount <= 0) { | |
| alert("Please enter a valid positive amount"); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| mint({ | |
| abi: CONTRIBUTION_ACCOUNTING_TOKEN_ABI, | |
| address: tokenAddress, | |
| functionName: "mint", | |
| args: [address, parseEther(mintAmount)] | |
| }) | |
| }} | |
| disabled={!mintAmount || isMinting} | |
| className="w-full h-12 text-lg" | |
| > | |
| {isMinting ? "Minting..." : "Mint Tokens"} | |
| </Button> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In web/src/app/[cat]/InteractionClient.tsx around lines 278 to 289, the mint
function call lacks input validation and error handling. Before calling mint,
add checks to ensure the user address is defined, verify that mintAmount is a
positive number, and wrap the parseEther call in a try-catch block to handle any
parsing errors gracefully. If validation fails, prevent the mint call and
provide appropriate user feedback.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor