Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs(adrs): add monorepo adr
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
b-kelly committed Nov 23, 2022
1 parent 307e118 commit 85c9689
Showing 1 changed file with 34 additions and 0 deletions.
34 changes: 34 additions & 0 deletions adrs/0002-monorepo.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
# [Transition Stacks to a monorepo]

**Date:** 2022-11-28

**Related PR:** #1191

## Issue

The Stacks repo is growing in complexity and will soon require many different dependencies that are optional for most consumers.

## Decision

Despite shipping many different concepts (atomic classes, CSS components, JS components), the interdependency chains are relatively linear. This means that we can fairly trivially split the repo into smaller portions.

Our current codebase could be split like so:
- Atomic classes (no dependencies)
- CSS Components (depends on Atomic components)
- JS Components (depends on Stimulus, Popper.js, CSS + Atomic components)
- Documentation site (depends on JS components, 11ty + plugins)

When the codebase expands in the future, we'll be able to add the following without worrying about consumers needing to import dependencies they don't need:
- Front-end component library or libraries (e.g. React, Web Components)
- Large, complex components (e.g. autocomplete)
- Extra build chain items, such as a [Style Dictionary](https://amzn.github.io/style-dictionary/)

We'd also be able to fold the [Stacks-Icons](https://github.com/StackExchange/Stacks-Icons) and [Stacks-Utils](https://github.com/StackExchange/Stacks-Utils) repos into this main monorepo as well.

## Additional Info

On the technical front, we could manage the monorepo with [npm workspaces](https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v9/using-npm/workspaces?v=true) or another dedicated tool such as [Rush](https://rushjs.io/pages/intro/welcome/), [Lerna](https://lerna.js.org/) or [Bit](https://bit.dev/).

In regards to changelog / release notes generation, we'd continue using Conventional Commits, but moving to use [release-please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please) which [does support monorepos](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please/blob/main/docs/manifest-releaser.md).

For backwards compatibility, we can trivially create a `@stackoverflow/stacks` "meta-package" that simply imports, then re-exports the dependency packages.

0 comments on commit 85c9689

Please sign in to comment.