-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update builtin collections imports to be forward-compatible with Python3.10+ #253
Conversation
updating workflow to user currently supported versioning syntax
The setup-python action@v2 does not accommodate for the fact that there is no python3.6 release for ubuntu 22, so we need to upgrade the version to allow for backwards compatibility.
I had to tweak the tox.yml build because |
…till being run here.
missed an error message on a test that looks for the name that changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM overall
We need an updated changelog and a 🟢 build to merge it.
I know it's not related to your PR, but if you have a few cycles to look into it, - that'll help to move forward with it.
I've updated the changelog as requested, but I have no idea where to start looking for these tests. do you have any idea where a good place to start would be? |
From https://github.com/StackStorm/orquesta/actions, the latest green build was in the https://github.com/StackStorm/orquesta/pull/256/files I think it makes sense to fix master branch first, by taking from that PR adjustments to the GH Actions and tests. Once the master is green, the build in this PR would be easier to adjust. |
.github/workflows/tox.yml
Outdated
os: [ubuntu-latest, ubuntu-22.04, ubuntu-20.04] | ||
exclude: | ||
- python-version: "3.10" | ||
os: ubuntu-20.04 | ||
- python-version: "3.6" | ||
os: ubuntu-22.04 | ||
- python-version: "3.6" | ||
os: ubuntu-latest | ||
runs-on: ${{matrix.os}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here https://github.com/StackStorm/orquesta/pull/256/files#diff-8a1944567ec5d9e12aaaac28489c47e6567e13b58d861815379f9b8d3aeb2623R15 the build was green by using ubuntu-20.04 environment for both py3.6 and py3.8.
Maybe that's the reason of so many unit test fails in this PR build? Worth checking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, those are some really useful points.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndroxxTraxxon The CI is fixed here #257 and is now ✅ on master, thanks to @amanda11 and @nzlosh.
Please sync your work with the master branch.
Co-authored-by: Eugen C. <1533818+armab@users.noreply.github.com>
remove Python 3.12 from testing matrix
I'd be inclined to drop 3.6 from the matrix and add py3.9 + py.311 |
Remove tests for 3.10 -- the package isn't ready yet.
I'd be okay adding 3.9, but the project isn't ready for 3.10+. Between the nose tests and the pip version, there are still a bunch of items that need to be addressed before 3.10 is possible. |
Per today's TSC meeting, I dropped support (and testing) for Python 3.6, and added testing against 3.9, 3.10, and 3.11 |
I think we still need python3.6 for releasing a So please keep the py3.6 in this PR which could be dropped after releasing a patch version. Alternative is to postpone merging this one until making an |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot, great work! 💯
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Great job! LGTM
What else needs to happen to merge this? |
@armab I initially asked for support for py3.11 and drop py3.6 because an st2 3.8.1 release wasn't a consideration. As the 3.8.1 release manager, do you want to merge this for st2 3.8.1 or hold for st2 3.9? |
I think we should merge, but @armab up to you. This just adds us running the tests on the extra python, and doesn't affect us still releasing ST2 only on 3.6 and 3.8 for 3.8.1 release. |
Hi @armab, I noticed that you did add this PR to the 3.8.1 release tracker. Were you looking for anything else in the PR before we merge it, or did we want to leave this until st2 v3.9.0? |
Yeah, I think it's OK to use the same orquesta = 1.6.0 (to be released) for both v3.8.1 and potentially v3.9.0 as there were no major additions or breaking changes. This one should work fine with py3.6 as well. Merging it, thanks everyone! |
Python 3.10 removes the deprecated aliases to the Collections abstract base classes, which was done in Python 3.3
Python3.10 Changelog:
This change refactors the imports in 2 files that were still using this deprecated import style to one that is more globally supported.
https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.10.html#removed