Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zodiacal light practically invisible with the slightest light pollution #1489

Closed
Atque opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1510
Closed

Zodiacal light practically invisible with the slightest light pollution #1489

Atque opened this issue Feb 2, 2021 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1510
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Improve existing functionality
Milestone

Comments

@Atque
Copy link
Contributor

Atque commented Feb 2, 2021

I'm not quite sure if this is really a bug (I've seen the comments in the code, and it seems intentional).

The zodiacal light is almost completely invisible if the light pollution is set to 2 or above. However, in reality, a Bortle 2 site would show a great deal of zodiacal light. I've seen it from a Bortle 4 area, quite impressive.

However, if one sets the extinction coefficient to 0.0, then the zodiacal light is displayed more realistically. Visible until about Bortle 4. Compare these two screenshots with light pollution set at 2:

With extinction = 0.2:
ext02

With extinction = 0.0:
ext00

I find it unrealistic.

@gzotti
Copy link
Member

gzotti commented Feb 2, 2021

Not a bug, just a need for further tweaking.

Indeed LP (Bortle index) is the primary ZL killer. The primary question is how accurate the Bortle scale and also its implementation in Stellarium really are. I know an expert on light pollution who is not really happy with it and how Stellarium uses it. However, there is a mix of: eye adaptation; screen brightness; screen environment brightness; observer expectation and experience, and certainly more factors.

I hardly get to observe it, but implemented it after a visit in a pristine-sky location in Namibia's highlands (no LP, low extinction). I never saw it so bright again. I would have to return there (want to, at some time...) to improve the visual balancing. You can tweak the values in code and suggest a better match. The extinction should be kept at reasonable levels (definitely >0.10) in the process.
If all fails, you can set ZL brighter, just as you can set the Milky Way brighter.

I want to give the sky brightness module a thorough review later this year.

@gzotti gzotti added the enhancement Improve existing functionality label Feb 2, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2021

Thank you @Atque for suggesting this enhancement.

@Atque
Copy link
Contributor Author

Atque commented Feb 3, 2021

@gzotti I could play around with the values a bit to see if I can find something more useful. If I do, I might create a PR.

@axd1967
Copy link
Contributor

axd1967 commented Feb 15, 2021

See also #1504

gzotti pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2021
- Make the ZL better visible with Bortle 2 and 3, which is more realistic.
- Now harmonized extinction with Milky Way
@gzotti gzotti added this to the 0.21.0 milestone Feb 22, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2021

Please check the fresh version (development snapshot) of Stellarium:
https://github.com/Stellarium/stellarium-data/releases/tag/weekly-snapshot

@github-actions
Copy link

Please check the latest stable version of Stellarium:
https://github.com/Stellarium/stellarium/releases/latest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improve existing functionality
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants