Ignore directives for aggregate rules

[anderseknert]

We will need to figure out what ignoring something means in the context of aggregate rules.

rules:
  testing: 
    some-aggregate-rule:
      level: error

ignore:
  files:
    - foo/bar.rego

The way we currently work with ignore directives, foo/bar.rego wouldn't even get parsed. This has proven to be necessary, as foo/bar.rego might not even contain valid Rego. However, perhaps we'll need to consider more fine-grained ignores for aggregate rules? It seems valid to me that one would want to include some file in aggregation, but not necessarily in the linter report. In other words, "use this file to determine whether we have a violation in another file, but ignore violations in the file itself".

Also, if an aggregate rule says "only allow imports of packages, not rules", we'll want to respect explicit, line-level ignore directives of that rule:

# regal ignore:prefer-package-imports
import foo.bar.rule

We should also provide a way for aggregate rules to consider this the same way we do for normal rules.

[anderseknert]

Having thought more about it, ignored files should be ignored entirely and not be aggregated. Similar to how we should treat them in the language server, i.e. not use them for completion suggestions and so on.

The ignore directive issue is however still relevant, but better described in #803, so I'll close this in favor of that issue.