Add parsing of ignore directives #67
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It is now possible to add an "ignore directive" above any line of Rego, to have Regal ignore the next line given that the rule(s) named in the directive match that of the linter being executed. Example: ```rego \# regal ignore:prefer-snake-case,use-assignment-operator default fooBar = "baz" ``` Note that this only works for the next _line_, and does not take into account concepts like packages, functions or rules. But this should be good enough for most use cases, I think. Resolves #39 Signed-off-by: Anders Eknert <anders@styra.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is now possible to add an "ignore directive" above any line of Rego, to have Regal ignore the next line given that the
rule(s) named in the directive match that of the linter being executed. Example:
Note that this only works for the next line, and does not take into account concepts like packages, functions or rules. But this should be good enough for most use cases, I think.
Resolves #39