Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend redundant-existence-check to fail redundant ref checks #949

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

anderseknert
Copy link
Member

@anderseknert anderseknert commented Jul 29, 2024

Fixes #935

@anderseknert anderseknert force-pushed the more-redundant-checks branch from ac5f76f to 2a61785 Compare July 29, 2024 21:57
@anderseknert anderseknert linked an issue Jul 29, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@anderseknert anderseknert force-pushed the more-redundant-checks branch from 2a61785 to 5764af1 Compare July 30, 2024 06:44
Also add end location to this rule's report

Fixes #935

Signed-off-by: Anders Eknert <anders@styra.com>
@charlieegan3 charlieegan3 force-pushed the more-redundant-checks branch from 5764af1 to 938f98b Compare July 30, 2024 08:51
@anderseknert anderseknert merged commit 7bc7868 into main Jul 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@anderseknert anderseknert deleted the more-redundant-checks branch July 30, 2024 09:17
srenatus pushed a commit to srenatus/regal that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
…aInc#949)

Also add end location to this rule's report

Fixes StyraInc#935

Signed-off-by: Anders Eknert <anders@styra.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Extend redundant-existence-checkto include := x if x
2 participants