-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I update api #25
I update api #25
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@techeng322 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve several updates across various files, including the addition of a new function Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
lib/verifySubscription.ts (1)
7-36
: Formatting improvements look good. Consider using a constant for the comparison.The formatting changes improve readability. However, we can further enhance the code by using a constant for the zero comparison.
Consider defining a constant for the zero comparison:
+const NO_SUBSCRIPTION = 0n; // ... (rest of the function) - return result > 0; + return result > NO_SUBSCRIPTION;This makes the code more self-documenting and easier to maintain if the condition changes in the future.
app/api/profile/route.ts (1)
1-30
: Overall, good changes with room for minor improvements.The changes to this file extend the functionality of the GET endpoint by adding the
connectedZoraProfile
information. The implementation is generally sound, with only minor suggestions for improvement as noted in previous comments.One additional suggestion:
Consider updating the PR title to be more descriptive of the changes made. For example: "Add connected Zora profile check to profile API endpoint".
This will help other developers understand the nature of the changes at a glance.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 19-19: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- app/api/profile/route.ts (1 hunks)
- app/api/zora/collections/route.ts (1 hunks)
- app/api/zora/feeRecipients/route.ts (1 hunks)
- app/api/zora/tokens/route.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/consts.tsx (1 hunks)
- lib/getEndpointsList.tsx (1 hunks)
- lib/stack/getIdentify.tsx (1 hunks)
- lib/verifySubscription.ts (1 hunks)
- middleware.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- app/api/zora/collections/route.ts
- app/api/zora/feeRecipients/route.ts
- app/api/zora/tokens/route.ts
- lib/consts.tsx
- lib/getEndpointsList.tsx
- middleware.ts
🧰 Additional context used
Biome
app/api/profile/route.ts
[error] 19-19: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (7)
lib/stack/getIdentify.tsx (3)
1-2
: LGTM: Import statements are clear and appropriate.The import statements are well-structured, using named imports for better readability. The
Address
type from 'viem' and thestack
object from the local client are correctly imported.
9-9
: LGTM: Appropriate use of default export.The use of default export for this single function module is correct and allows for flexible importing by consumers.
4-7
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider enhancing function robustness and flexibility.
The function implementation is concise and focused. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The function name
getIdentify
might be more idiomatic asgetIdentity
.- There's no error handling for potential failures in the
getTags
call.- The 'custom identity' string is hardcoded, which might limit flexibility.
Consider applying these improvements:
-const getIdentify = async (address: Address) => { - const identify = await stack.getTags(address, 'custom identity'); - return identify; +const getIdentity = async (address: Address, identityType: string = 'custom identity') => { + try { + const identity = await stack.getTags(address, identityType); + return identity; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch identity:', error); + throw error; + } };This refactored version:
- Uses a more idiomatic function name
- Adds basic error handling
- Allows for different identity types via an optional parameter
Could you clarify if there's a specific reason for using 'custom identity' as the tag? Are there other types of identities that might be fetched in the future?
lib/verifySubscription.ts (1)
1-4
: LGTM: Import statements are correct.The import statements are properly structured and include all necessary dependencies.
app/api/profile/route.ts (3)
1-7
: LGTM: Import statements and formatting.The new import for
getIdentify
is correctly added, and the minor formatting changes improve consistency across the file.
21-21
: LGTM: Updated response structure.The inclusion of
connectedZoraProfile
in the response is consistent with the earlier changes and maintains a clear response structure.
30-30
: LGTM: Consistent formatting.The addition of a semicolon to the export statement improves consistency with the rest of the file.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
getIdentify
, to retrieve identity data based on user addresses.SETTINGS_STACK_ID
.Bug Fixes
verifySubscription
function name.Style
Chores
middleware
configuration for cleaner code structure.