-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: RNA formation, issue #354 #364
Conversation
add RNA in nucleus
add reaction MAR13086, transport of RNA from nucleus to cytoplasm
implement the suggestions of issue SysBioChalmers#354 - add compartmentalised metabolite RNA[n] (MAM02847n) - change reaction MAR07161 (RNA creation) from cytoplasm to nucleus - add transport reaction of RNA from the nucleus to cytoplasm (MAR13086) - move gene rule of reaction MAR08639 to reaction MAR13086, as it represents the nuclear pore complex - swap the direction of reaction MAR07162, as explained in issue SysBioChalmers#354 - remove the reaction of DNA transport between the nucleus and cytoplasm MAR08639, since DNA shouldn't go out of the nucleus and the reaction's gene rule is no longer needed
delete reaction MAR08639 and add reaction MAR13086
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure what is the appropriate reaction score for reaction MAR13086
Eh, good question. I think you can use the same score as was used for MAR08639, which was a 2.
and could not find ids form other databases for this reaction, probably beacause RNA has to be first processed into mature RNA (with polyA-tail and 5'Cap) before moving to cytoplasm...
Yeah, it's a very simplified representation of the process, so if you were not able to find anything from other databases after searching for a bit, then I think it's OK to leave it as is.
add deleted reaction MAR08639 to deprecatedReactions.tsv
score of reaction MAR13086 changed to 2
Main improvements in this PR:
implement the suggestions of issue #354
Comments:
I hereby confirm that I have:
develop
as a target branch