Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to remove all suffixes from batch processing #1309

Closed
OkyDooky opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Option to remove all suffixes from batch processing #1309

OkyDooky opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@OkyDooky
Copy link

OkyDooky commented Sep 2, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'd like to retain the original names of all the files I run through conversion as-is. Currently, I've turned off everything I'm allowed to in the File Output options:
Prefix: Empty
Suffix: Empty
Add file size: off
Add original filename: on
Replace number sequence: off
Overwrite files: off
Randomize filename: off

But, the replace number sequence option just seems to switch between adding the date&time and adding an incremental number count for batch processed files.

Describe the solution you'd like
Maybe divide the "Replace number sequence" option into two toggles? Or have it open a pop-up menu to select number/date/off?

Describe alternatives you've considered
I'd think putting those options actually in the batch processing screen would make sense, but that seems like it'd go against the design principles you set for the app.

Or maybe I've somehow missed something in the settings.

@OkyDooky OkyDooky added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 2, 2024
@T8RIN
Copy link
Owner

T8RIN commented Sep 3, 2024

I will think what can i do👀

@OkyDooky
Copy link
Author

OkyDooky commented Sep 3, 2024

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@T8RIN @OkyDooky and others