Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: integration test option to use ftl-provisioner #2892

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

jvmakine
Copy link
Contributor

@jvmakine jvmakine commented Sep 30, 2024

runs deployments through the provisioner if requested

This also adds a hidden CLI flags
--use-provisioner to deploy using the provisioner service instead of controller
--provisioner-endpoint to set the provisioner endpoint

Next, I will look how to integrate ftl-provisioner better with ftl serve

@jvmakine jvmakine requested review from a team and gak and removed request for a team September 30, 2024 01:17
@ftl-robot ftl-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
…oyments through the preovisioner

This also adds a hidden flags
 --use-provisioner to deploy using the provisioner service instead of controller
 --provisioner-endpoint to set the provisioner endpoint
@jvmakine jvmakine merged commit 13ed969 into main Sep 30, 2024
92 checks passed
@jvmakine jvmakine deleted the juho/start-provisioner-it branch September 30, 2024 03:12

go 1.23.0

replace github.com/TBD54566975/ftl => ./../../../../../..
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this might be too many path components?

client = rpc.ClientFromContext[provisionerconnect.ProvisionerServiceClient](ctx)
} else {
client = rpc.ClientFromContext[ftlv1connect.ControllerServiceClient](ctx)
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noice

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants