Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LT5 - math mode missing & consistency in wording/notation #46

Closed
AbbyANoble opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #159
Closed

LT5 - math mode missing & consistency in wording/notation #46

AbbyANoble opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #159
Assignees
Labels
calculus enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@AbbyANoble
Copy link
Contributor

Math mode is missing around y=0 in Remark 1.5.5

This section refers to positive infinity in a lot of ways:

  • positive infinity
  • +infinity
    • {the infinity symbol}
  • {infinity symbol}

Some consistency may be good here, like adopting just {the infinity symbol} and only putting the + in front when it needs emphasizing. Additionally, I'm not a fan of abbreviating positive infinity to +infinity (or negative infinity to -infinity) within a sentence.

@siwelwerd
Copy link
Contributor

I think we are starting to see this in the Precalculus book as well, so we should adopt a convention, add it to the style guide, and ensure we are consistent in both books.

@siwelwerd siwelwerd added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 11, 2024
@siwelwerd siwelwerd transferred this issue from TeamBasedInquiryLearning/calculus Jul 19, 2024
@siwelwerd siwelwerd mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2024
@daverosoff daverosoff self-assigned this Jul 26, 2024
@daverosoff daverosoff added this to the 2024 Edition milestone Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
calculus enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants