Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade jekyll from 4.2.2 to 4.3.0 #366

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

theScrabi
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
  • Gemfile.lock

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-RUBY-REXML-7462086
  551  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)

snyk-bot and others added 2 commits July 17, 2024 08:56
Use dev version of minima
@TobiGr TobiGr force-pushed the snyk-fix-6e5fecc9ef3aaf241e3e30cea271a26f branch from 4c4f7a7 to b5d693d Compare July 20, 2024 11:46
@TobiGr
Copy link
Contributor

TobiGr commented Aug 3, 2024

Fixed by #374

@TobiGr TobiGr closed this Aug 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants