[DCK] Remove builtin whitelist proxies from test

[yajo]

Apply Tecnativa/doodba#165 in scaffolding. See it for details.

[pedrobaeza]

What happens if you don't create globalwhitelist_shared? Maybe should we have a global-scaffolding project too?

[yajo]

What happens if you don't create globalwhitelist_shared?

See Tecnativa/doodba#67 (comment)

Maybe should we have a global-scaffolding project too?

It would be good, although I'm more on the side of dropping some roles into https://galaxy.ansible.com/ to enable full server pool management.

In any case, it's not ready for disclosure.

[pedrobaeza]

Well, I miss that also for SSL traefik proxy, so complete the system with the things you see more convenient (roles, scaffolding...).

[yajo]

I'll add that to my todo list.

[pedrobaeza]

I'm thinking that we should leave one commented example in the scaffolding for easier reference when we need local whitelist. Do you agree?

[yajo]

I don't think so; devel.yaml still has whitelists, and in case you want to document things, the place to do so is the documentation, not the scaffolding, which is just a template. The docs are in https://github.com/Tecnativa/doodba#how-can-i-whitelist-a-service-and-allow-external-access-to-it and https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-whitelist.