"pretty" example is much slower than YAJL's reformat

[miloyip]

From milo...@gmail.com on November 22, 2011 11:31:26

https://github.com/lloyd/yajl_vs_rapidjson This contradicts the results shown in https://code.google.com/p/rapidjson/wiki/Performance

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/rapidjson/issues/detail?id=1

[miloyip]

From milo...@gmail.com on November 21, 2011 19:32:54

the performance problem of pretty example should be mainly due to FileStream?, which uses fgetc(). And I will add another stream classes with buffers and using fread()/fwrite().

The https://code.google.com/p/rapidjson/wiki/Performance is aimed at testing parsing/generating performance, reading of source JSON string are excluded in the measurement.

However, I will fix the performance issues in examples soon, and gives results as well.

[miloyip]

From milo...@gmail.com on November 13, 2012 20:17:33

Revision r23 has modified pretty to use the new file stream. Need to rerun Lloyd's test.

Status: Fixed
Blockedon: -rapidjson:3 rapidjson:3