Skip to content

Euler072 - application of vector operations to reduce calculation time and refactoring numpy #9229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 1, 2023

Conversation

quant12345
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your change:

Application of vector operations to reduce calculation time and refactoring numpy.
With limit: int = 1_000_000, the calculation of the new algorithm is 40% faster, limit: int = 10_000_000 is almost twice as fast.

code test
import datetime

import numpy as np

"""
Problem 72 Counting fractions: https://projecteuler.net/problem=72

Description:

Consider the fraction, n/d, where n and d are positive integers. If n<d and HCF(n,d)=1,
it is called a reduced proper fraction.
If we list the set of reduced proper fractions for d ≤ 8 in ascending order of size, we
get: 1/8, 1/7, 1/6, 1/5, 1/4, 2/7, 1/3, 3/8, 2/5, 3/7, 1/2, 4/7, 3/5, 5/8, 2/3, 5/7,
3/4, 4/5, 5/6, 6/7, 7/8
It can be seen that there are 21 elements in this set.
How many elements would be contained in the set of reduced proper fractions for
d ≤ 1,000,000?

Solution:

Number of numbers between 1 and n that are coprime to n is given by the Euler's Totient
function, phi(n). So, the answer is simply the sum of phi(n) for 2 <= n <= 1,000,000
Sum of phi(d), for all d|n = n. This result can be used to find phi(n) using a sieve.

Time: 1 sec
"""


def solution(limit: int = 1_000_000) -> int:
    """
    Returns an integer, the solution to the problem
    >>> solution(10)
    31
    >>> solution(100)
    3043
    >>> solution(1_000)
    304191
    """

    phi = [i - 1 for i in range(limit + 1)]

    for i in range(2, limit + 1):
        if phi[i] == i - 1:
            for j in range(2 * i, limit + 1, i):
                phi[j] -= phi[j] // i

    return sum(phi[2 : limit + 1])


def solution_new(limit: int = 1_000_000) -> int:
    """
    Returns an integer, the solution to the problem
    >>> solution(10)
    31
    >>> solution(100)
    3043
    >>> solution(1_000)
    304191
    """

    # generating an array from -1 to limit
    phi = np.arange(-1, limit)

    for i in range(2, limit + 1):
        if phi[i] == i - 1:
            ind = np.arange(2 * i, limit + 1, i)# indexes for selection
            phi[ind] -= phi[ind] // i

    return np.sum(phi[2 : limit + 1])


if __name__ == "__main__":

    now = datetime.datetime.now()
    old = solution()
    print('Returns an integer old', old)
    time_original = datetime.datetime.now() - now
    print('time_original', time_original.total_seconds())

    now = datetime.datetime.now()
    new = solution_new()
    print('Returns an integer new', new)
    time_new = datetime.datetime.now() - now
    print('time_new', time_new.total_seconds())

    print('old == new', old == new)

Output:

limit: int = 1_000_000

Returns an integer old 303963552391
time_original 1.236859
Returns an integer new 303963552391
time_new 0.816209
old == new True


limit: int = 10_000_000

Returns an integer old 30396356427241
time_original 17.871657
Returns an integer new 30396356427241
time_new 9.741272
old == new True
  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 1, 2023
@tianyizheng02 tianyizheng02 merged commit 8d94f77 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 1, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 1, 2023
@quant12345 quant12345 deleted the euler072 branch October 5, 2023 14:06
sedatguzelsemme pushed a commit to sedatguzelsemme/Python that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2024
…e and refactoring numpy (TheAlgorithms#9229)

* Replacing the generator with numpy vector operations from lu_decomposition.

* Revert "Replacing the generator with numpy vector operations from lu_decomposition."

This reverts commit ad217c6.

* Application of vector operations  to reduce calculation time and refactoring numpy.

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@isidroas isidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This PR modified some existing files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants