Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TypeError for non-integer input #9250

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

TypeError for non-integer input #9250

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

mahiuddin-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@mahiuddin-dev mahiuddin-dev commented Oct 1, 2023

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 1, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 1, 2023
@tianyizheng02
Copy link
Contributor

@cclauss Do you think these TypeError checks are worth adding given that the function parameters are already type-hinted as ints?

@tianyizheng02 tianyizheng02 merged commit 4f8fa3c into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 10, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 10, 2023
sedatguzelsemme pushed a commit to sedatguzelsemme/Python that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2024
* type error check

* remove str input

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@isidroas isidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This PR modified some existing files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants