-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Support LLVM 18 #483
WIP: Support LLVM 18 #483
Conversation
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Leutwiler <bigcyrill@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
After a little poke, llvm-sys now has updated to support LLVM 18 |
Signed-off-by: xermicus <cyrill@parity.io>
Great, now I'm basically just waiting for an ubuntu build to use on CI |
I'm not sure what's going on with linux x86 binary LLVM releases, however the test suite passes locally for me. @TheDan64 the PR is ready to receive a review :) |
@xermicus wdym by the binarys? Tests seem to be working. Or was this an intermittent thing? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Oh, there's no build check for LLVM 18, could you please add one @xermicus |
@TheDan64 yep I have it on my radar |
Brew just got LLVM 18, so maybe this has tricked through the ecosystem now? |
Description
Support LLVM 18.
Related Issue
#482
How This Has Been Tested
Option<Breaking Changes>
Checklist
Introduce feature flags
Wait out
llvm-sys
release supporting LLVM 18Guard removed API methods and make test suite pass
Implement added functionality
Operand BundlesWe don't need this right now, can I leave this open for a future PR?I have read the Contributing Guide