-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to calculate the loss for imperfect CSI case? #2
Comments
|
Thank you very much.~ |
Dear Mr. Lin, |
The calculation of loss function, is discussed in the issues of the repo. You can refer to it, because some other people have the similar question, so I answered it already. The channels is generated via the codes provided via the author of "Reliable Beamspace Channel Estimation for Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Systems with Lens Antenna Array", you can find it in the authors'own website. I just used his codes.
You can also try other channel models, hopefully my BFNN can also work.
…-----原始邮件-----
发件人:AlirezaJahanbakhshi <notifications@github.com>
发送时间:2020-02-25 17:48:57 (星期二)
收件人: TianLin0509/BF-design-with-DL <BF-design-with-DL@noreply.github.com>
抄送: "Lin Tian" <17210720082@fudan.edu.cn>, Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
主题: Re: [TianLin0509/BF-design-with-DL] How to calculate the loss for imperfect CSI case? (#2)
Dear Mr. Lin,
I also have question about calculation of loss function. would you please tell where did you exactly calculate loss function in your code?
I appreciate your kind cooperation
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Thank you very much for your answer. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
First I’d like to thank you very much for providing the code online for further learning. Then, if you get some time, may I ask some questions regarding your code? I put my question here as following:
I really appreciate your reply, and thank you very much in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: