Migrate /warn command

[RealYusufIsmail]

Overview

This adds the /warn user reason command, which lets moderators warn users. Warnings can then be later retrieved using /audit (#312 ).

As usual, the command will try to DM the target to inform them about the action, have the usual permission checks (heavy moderation role in this case) and similar. Nothing really special to see here.

Part of #63 .

• The command saves the warns
• Users without ban perms can not use the warn command

[Zabuzard]

Before looking at the code, I am proposing to change the UX to:

/warn user reason

and then having a separate

/audit user

command which shows:

• all warnings
• all bans
• all kicks
• all mutes
  (with reason)

(it is okay if the command can only capture actions that have been executed with this bot - no need to check the actual audit log)

[RealYusufIsmail]

So are you saying i just delete the retrieve part.

[Zabuzard]

Dont request a new review from me unless you think you fixed all my mentioned issues.

You know the story of the boy who cried for the wolf and then nobody believed him and came anymore when the real wolf was there? This is kinda how I feel like when you do this. It has the opposite effect of what you want to achieve, namely that I will delay my review and ignore your "requests".

[RealYusufIsmail]

Ok I will improve on that note

[Zabuzard]

Please make the command role instead of permission based (see #244 , use the heavy moderation role pattern). Best would be if you rebase ur branch on top of the branch from #244 or just wait until it is merged.

[Zabuzard]

Blocked by #244

[RealYusufIsmail]

Please make the command role instead of permission based (see #244 , use the heavy moderation role pattern). Best would be if you rebase ur branch on top of the branch from #244 or just wait until it is merged.

Yeah I understand. I was waiting for the ban/kick pr to go through originally

[Zabuzard]

The commit history of this PR is absolutely terrible. It must be squashed or rewritten.

DO NOT REBASE THIS, IT MUST BE SQUASHED (or rewritten first)

done

[RealYusufIsmail]

?

[Zabuzard]

?

The changes requested by Tais have been implemented by you, hence I dismissed his change-request.