Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Remove defunct IRC channel from README.md #2456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2023

Conversation

JFreegman
Copy link
Member

@JFreegman JFreegman commented Dec 7, 2023

We can replace this with a tox groupchat once we make a release.


This change is Reviewable

We can replace this with a tox groupchat once we make a release
@JFreegman JFreegman added the documentation Changes to the documentation label Dec 7, 2023
@JFreegman JFreegman added this to the v0.2.19 milestone Dec 7, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (26d41fc) 74.42% compared to head (d89677f) 74.32%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2456      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.42%   74.32%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines       26264    26264              
==========================================
- Hits        19546    19522      -24     
- Misses       6718     6742      +24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@emdee-is
Copy link

emdee-is commented Dec 7, 2023

Do you really want to remove the only public forum for discussion on Tox?

I know the IRC channel is dead, but it wasn't, and it was bi-directionally gatewayed into a Tox NGC. Maybe the Tox NGC has died too, but the IRC should be kept alive in case there are users, or potential users. It is expected that an opensource software package has a libera chat to help users, and it was a good place for lurking former/retired/paused developers (@iphydf :-,) to keep an eye on things.

Instead of abandoning the IRC and editing the documentation, I think you should revive the IRC bridge, and respond to users, or maybe even potential users.

@JFreegman
Copy link
Member Author

JFreegman commented Dec 7, 2023

Do you really want to remove the only public forum for discussion on Tox?

We've moved development discussion to a public tox groupchat, which is still very much active. The reason we're not putting the ID in the readme yet is because the DHT groupchats aren't in a release yet, but that should happen any day now. If you want to join, the ID is: 360497DA684BCE2A500C1AF9B3A5CE949BBB9F6FB1F91589806FB04CA039E313

We stopped using Libera because its servers are run by an unethical and very immature group of people who blatantly violate the privacy of their users as well push censorship on them. Tox is an inherently an anti-censorship, pro-privacy project; it simply makes no sense for us to continue using such a service, especially when we now have a fully functioning public groupchat implementation of our own.

@JFreegman JFreegman merged commit d89677f into TokTok:master Dec 7, 2023
52 checks passed
@JFreegman JFreegman deleted the remove_irc_readme branch December 7, 2023 16:04
@emdee-is
Copy link

emdee-is commented Dec 7, 2023

I'll keep the followup discussion in #2455

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Changes to the documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants