Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.54.1 #260

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 7, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 5.54.0 -> 5.54.1 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 5.54.0 -> 5.54.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v5.54.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v5.54.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 3f27824 to dae331e Compare March 7, 2023 05:29
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 6b2f3d4 into main Mar 7, 2023
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch March 7, 2023 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants