Specified relationName is not honoured for mutations and aggregations

[coupster74]

Describe the bug
When a relationship name is specified in the definition, in v5.1.0-alpha.1 it appears to be working on the entity results (wasn't in the ^4.0.0 version I was using before). However, aggregate functions are still being pluralized and the relationship name is not being used

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

yes

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. for a relationship, specify the name, example below:

@FilterableUnPagedRelation('ofInterestTo', () => Company, {
  relationName: 'ofInterestTo',
  nullable: true,
  update: { enabled: true },
  remove: { enabled: true },
})

when you view the fields available, you see aggregate results are not honoring the relationship name:

nor are the resulting mutations:

Expected behavior
Mutations and aggregate graphql attributes/objects should also adhere to the relationship name specified.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• Node Version v18.14.0
• Nestjs-query Version: 5.0.0-alpha.1

[TriPSs]

Thanks for reporting, I see I only updated the read relations resolver and not the others.

[TriPSs]

Should be fixed in v5.1.0-alpha.2