Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch 2 #98

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Alumniminium
Copy link
Contributor

Abuse me @root-hal9000

@Alumniminium Alumniminium added the initial-review adds to initial-review project label Jul 25, 2024
@meichthys
Copy link
Contributor

Oops. I didn't mean to push to your branch (I didn't even think that would be possible). I'm not very used to the process of suggesting changes via VSCode. I thought i would have pushed my changes to my own Initial-Review branch and then submit a merge request to your Initial-Review branch, but apparently my remotes weren't setup correctly.

I suppose if you're ok with the minor changes I made, then we should still be good to merge.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Alumniminium Alumniminium left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Who doesn't hate periods.

All good, thanks for fixing it up! Pretty weird you had write access to my fork though.

@meichthys
Copy link
Contributor

Who doesn't hate periods.

All good, thanks for fixing it up! Pretty weird you had write access to my fork though.

Yeah, I have no clue why I was able to push to your fork, perhaps there was an option on your merge request to allow maintainers to edit your branch? I think I've seen that before 🤷‍♂️

@Alumniminium Alumniminium merged commit 0eb57d9 into TriliumNext:initial-review Aug 5, 2024
@Alumniminium Alumniminium self-assigned this Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
initial-review adds to initial-review project
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants